Shane Scofield v. National Tax Advisory Services LLC et al
| Shane Scofield |
| National Tax Advisory Services LLC a California limited liability company doing business as Action Tax Group and John Doe |
| 2:2022cv06931 |
| September 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 STATUS REPORT filed by Plaintiff Shane Scofield. (Javitch, Mark) |
| Filing 21 STATUS REPORT filed by Plaintiff Shane Scofield. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mark L. Javitch, #2 Exhibit)(Javitch, Mark) |
Filing 20
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY PRIOR TO ENTERING DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo: granting in part #19 MOTION. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff seeks leave to conduct discovery to learn the identities and contact information of persons whom Defendant purportedly called and the dates and quantities of those calls. The request to continue the deadline for filing a motion for default judgment is GRANTED IN PART. The January 17, 2023 deadline is continued by four months to May 17, 2023. Further, so that the Court may properly monitor the early discovery in this action, it is ORDERED that, beginning January 17, 2023, and continuing every thirty days thereafter, Plaintiff will submit a Status Report to the undersigned Magistrate Judge (see document for further details). (hr)
|
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to conduct limited discovery filed by plaintiff Shane Scofield. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Javitch, Mark) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 1/17/2023. (rfi)
|
| Filing 17 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Defendant National Tax Advisory Services LLC. (jp) |
| Filing 16 Second REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant National Tax Advisory Services LLC filed by plaintiff Shane Scofield. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mark L. Javitch in support of Plaintiff's Request for Clerk's Default) (Javitch, Mark) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shane Scofield, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mark Shapiro, authorized to accept service for Law Offices of Keith F. Elder, registered agent for National Tax Advisory Services, LLC in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Javitch, Mark) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Shane Scofieldto Order to Show Cause #11 (Javitch, Mark) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: First REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant National Tax Advisory Services LLC #12 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: (1) The name of the person served does not exactly match the person named in complaint. (2) Requesting party shall file a new Request/Application with noted deficiencies corrected in order to have default reconsidered. (jp) |
| Filing 12 First REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant National Tax Advisory Services LLC filed by plaintiff Shane Scofield. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mark L. Javitch in support of Plaintiff's Request for Clerk's Default) (Javitch, Mark) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 11/16/2022. (rfi)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shane Scofield, upon Defendant National Tax Advisory Services LLC served on 10/10/2022, answer due 10/31/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Keith F. Elder, Esq, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Javitch, Mark) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (pk)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant National Tax Advisory Services LLC. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (et) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Shane Scofield. (Javitch, Mark) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Shane Scofield. (Javitch, Mark) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Shane Scofield, identifying None. (Javitch, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34047463 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Shane Scofield. (Attorney Mark Louis Javitch added to party Shane Scofield(pty:pla))(Javitch, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
