Joseph LaRocca v. City of Los Angeles et al
| Joseph LaRocca |
| CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Los Angeles Police Department, CHIEF MICHEL MOORE, Officer Emanuel Cuevas Ramirez, Michel Moore and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2022cv06948 |
| September 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Having reviewed the parties' Stipulation to Continue the Case Management Conference, and GOOD CAUSE appearing therefore, the Stipulation is hereby GRANTED. The Case Management Conference is continued to December 12, 2022. RE: Stipulation to Continue #24 . (aco)
|
| Filing 24 STIPULATION to Continue Case management Conference from December 5, 2022 filed by Plaintiff Joseph LaRocca. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Burton, John) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 12/5/2022 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #18 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Amended Answer to Complaint. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (aco) |
| Filing 21 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, Michel Moore, (Ford, Ty) |
| Filing 20 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, Michel Moore.(Attorney Ty A Ford added to party Michel Moore(pty:dft))(Ford, Ty) |
| Filing 19 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, (Ford, Ty) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department.(Ford, Ty) |
| Filing 17 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, (Ford, Ty) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department.(Attorney Ty A Ford added to party City of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Ty A Ford added to party Los Angeles Police Department(pty:dft))(Ford, Ty) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Joseph LaRocca, upon Defendant Emanuel Cuevas Ramirez served on 10/4/2022, answer due 10/25/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Emanuel Cuevas Ramirez in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Burton, John) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Joseph LaRocca, upon Defendant Michel Moore served on 10/4/2022, answer due 10/25/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michel Moore in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Burton, John) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Joseph LaRocca, upon Defendant Los Angeles Police Department served on 10/4/2022, answer due 10/25/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Los Angeles PoliceDepartment in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Burton, John) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Joseph LaRocca, upon Defendant City of Los Angeles served on 10/4/2022, answer due 10/25/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon City of Los Angeles in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Burton, John) |
|
Filing 11
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 2:20-cv-05027 CBM(ASx) (rn)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, Michel Moore, Emanuel Cuevas Ramirez. (sh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Joseph LaRocca. Related Case(s): CV. 20-5027 CMB (Burton, John) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Joseph LaRocca, identifying City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, Chief Michel Moore, Officer Emanuel Cuevas Ramirez. (Burton, John) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Joseph LaRocca. (Burton, John) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Joseph LaRocca. (Burton, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34050481 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Joseph LaRocca. (Attorney John C. Burton added to party Joseph LaRocca(pty:pla))(Burton, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
