Paul E Marshall v. Mechanics Bank Auto Finance et al
| Paul E Marshall, Jr. |
| Mechanics Bank Auto Finance, Bill Katafias and Andy Fernandez |
| 2:2022cv06973 |
| September 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE upon Defendant Service of the Summons and First Amended Complaint were executed upon Mechanics Bank Auto Finance.(rolm) |
| Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The Court has revised its procedures regarding mandatory chambers copies in civil cases newly assigned to Judge Scarsi. The Court authorizes the parties to this case to follow the new procedures in lieu of the procedures stated in Initial Standing Order 9(e). More information about the new procedures is available at https://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/honorable-mark-c-scarsi THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cbr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendants Andy Fernandez, Bill Katafias, Mechanics Bank Auto Finance amending Complaint - (Discovery) #1 filed by plaintiff Paul E Marshall, Jr.(lc) |
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT #1 . Courts may dismiss a claim sua sponte for failure to comply with Federal Ruleof Civil Procedure 8(a)(2). (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS AS ENUMERATED HEREIN). The Court dismisses Plaintiffs complaint in its entirety. The Court gives Plaintiff leave to amend. If Plaintiff seeks to pursue the dismissed claims, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint within 14 days of this Order. Any amended complaint must contain factual allegations sufficient to cure the deficiencies identified in this Order. If Plaintiff declines to file an amended complaint within the required time, the Court will deem the dismissed claims abandoned. (lc)
|
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Paul E Marshall, Jr on MECHANICS BANK/ANDY FERNANDEZ, Supervisor Collections on 10/03/2022 answer due 10/24/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Anna Gomes, Intake Specialist for Registered Agent CT Corporation in compliance with statute not specified. (lc) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY (IN CHAMBERS) NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Although Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, i.e., without legal representation, she/he nonetheless is required to comply with Court orders, the Local Rules, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 83-2.2.3. The Local Rules are available on the Court's website, http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/court-procedures/ local-rules. The Court cannot provide legal advice to any party, including pro se litigants, i.e., parties who are not represented by a lawyer. There is a free "Pro Se Clinic" that can provide information and guidance about many aspects of civil litigation in this Court. The Court notes that a party to this lawsuit does not have a lawyer. Parties in court without a lawyer are called "pro se litigants." These parties often face special challenges in federal court. Public Counsel runs a free Federal Pro Se Clinic where pro se litigants can get information and guidance. The Clinic is located at the Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012 (note that the clinic may not be open for in-person appointments during the pandemic). Pro se litigants must call or submit an on-line application to request services as follows: on-line applications can be submitted at http://prose.cacd.uscourts.gov/los-angeles, or call (213) 385-2977, ext. 270. Pro se litigants may submit documents for filing through the Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) instead of mailing or bringing documents to the Clerk's Office. Only internet access and an e-mail address are required. Documents are submitted in PDF format through an online portal on the Court's website. To access EDSS and for additional information, visit the Court's website at https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/edss. Attorneys may not use EDSS to submit documents on behalf of their clients. Attorneys are required by the local rules to file documents electronically using the Court's CM/ECF System. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo) |
|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Paul E Marshall, Jr. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendants Andy Fernandez, Bill Katafias, Mechanics Bank Auto Finance. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Andy Fernandez, Bill Katafias, Mechanics Bank Auto Finance.Case assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson.(Filing fee $ 402:PAID) Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Paul E Marshall, Jr. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
