Nicholas Pual Newbould v. Southwest Airlines Co. et al
Plaintiff: Nicholas Paul Newbould
Defendant: Jordan Lacovella, Southwest Airlines Co. and Does 1-10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2022cv07190
Filed: October 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2022 Filing 12 JOINT 16(b)/26(f) REPORT REPORT of Rule 16(b)/26(f) Matters Pursuant to Court's Order Setting Rule 16(b)/26(f) Scheduling Conference filed by Defendant Southwest Airlines Co.. (Ehlers, Joy)
October 31, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Paul Newbould pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Jordan Lacovella. (Bral, Michael)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/25/2022. (hc)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (hc)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-07190 JAK(MRWx). (rn)
October 5, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
October 5, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
October 5, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh)
October 4, 2022 Filing 4 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Southwest Airlines Co., identifying The Vanguard Group. (Ehlers, Joy)
October 3, 2022 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Jordan Lacovella, Southwest Airlines Co. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Paul Newbould. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 8/26/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
October 3, 2022 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Southwest Airlines Co. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 10/3/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
October 3, 2022 Filing 3 Certificate of Service filed by Defendant Southwest Airlines Co. re: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 (Ehlers, Joy)
October 3, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Southwest Airlines Co.. (Ehlers, Joy)
October 3, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court of California, case number 22STCV27942 Receipt No: ACACDC-34092293 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Southwest Airlines Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Exhibit Answer) (Attorney Joy Jaeger Ehlers added to party Southwest Airlines Co.(pty:dft))(Ehlers, Joy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nicholas Pual Newbould v. Southwest Airlines Co. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas Paul Newbould
Represented By: Omid Nosrati
Represented By: Michael J Bral
Represented By: Rene M Maldonado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jordan Lacovella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southwest Airlines Co.
Represented By: Joy Jaeger Ehlers
Represented By: Marcie S Fitzsimmons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?