Greenie Anthony Weaver v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
| Greenie Anthony Weaver |
| Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2022cv07287 |
| October 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER REINSTATING STAY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL No. 2924. IT IS ORDERED that the stay of the Panel's conditional transfer order designated as "CTO-103" filed on 10/11/2022, is REINSTATED. MD JS-5. Case reopened. (gk)
|
| Filing 14 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Southern District of Florida, 9:22-cv-81636 filed 10/26/2022. (rolm) |
| Filing 13 Conditional Transfer Order - CTO-103 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2924, transferring case to USDC, Southern District of Florida and assigned to Honorable Honorable Robin L. Rosenberg. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (rolm) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS PENDING TRANSFER TO MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Stay Pending Transfer to Multidistrict Litigation #5 . The Court STAYS this case pending decision of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation in In re Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2924. Defendant to file a Status Report every 90 days from this Order, and ten days after the decision is made, if the case is not transferred. (gk)
|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, served on 10/7/22. (Beroukhim, E.) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (sh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC., filed by Plaintiff Greenie Anthony Weaver.[FILED IN STATE COURT 10/28/2021 SUBMITTE AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, served on 10/6/22. (Beroukhim, E.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Transfer to Multidistrict Litigation filed by Defendant Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Beroukhim, E.) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 JURY DEMAND. filed by Defendant Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC.(Beroukhim, E.) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, identifying Sanofi. (Beroukhim, E.) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. (Beroukhim, E.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21STCV39692 Receipt No: ACACDC-34109974 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney E. Alex Beroukhim added to party Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC(pty:dft))(Beroukhim, E.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
