Shuk-Li Tam Ebihara v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Shuk-Li Tam Ebihara and USCIS Los Angeles Field Office |
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services |
2:2022cv07299 |
October 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Dolly M Gee |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services answer now due 1/11/2023, re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by RESPONDENT U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.(Attorney Joanne I. Osinoff added to party U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:res))(Osinoff, Joanne) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shuk-Li Tam Ebihara, upon Defendant U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 10/13/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to N/A -service via certified mail. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to USCIS Civil Process Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail receipt)(Tran, Hung) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by petitioner Shuk-Li Tam Ebihara, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #9 served on 10/18/2022. (Tran, Hung) |
Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner Shuk-Li Tam Ebihara, (Tran, Hung) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 2 Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
Filing 5 60 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Respondent U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (lh) |
Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (lh) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Petitioner Shuk-Li Tam Ebihara. (Tran, Hung) |
Filing 1 PETITION to Change Date of Birth on Certificate of Naturalization Receipt No: ACACDC-34113217 - Fee: $402, filed by Petitioner Shuk-Li Tam Ebihara. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Hung Ban Tran added to party Shuk-Li Tam Ebihara(pty:bkmov))(Tran, Hung) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.