JRUCW, Inc. et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
Plaintiff: JRUCW, Inc., JRUCW Pizza, Inc, KSTAR, Inc. and MIRABUX, Inc.
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation and Does 1 through 100, Inclusive
Case Number: 2:2022cv07374
Filed: October 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: John E McDermott
Nature of Suit: Contract: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2022 Filing 18 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Lane R. Conrad to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Starbucks Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34449556) filed by defendant Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (McLaughlin, Nicole)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: granting #14 #16 Non-Resident Attorney Daniel J. Oates APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Starbucks Corporation, designating Nicole Marie McLaughlin as local counsel. (lom)
December 7, 2022 Filing 16 Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Daniel J. Oates to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Starbucks Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 12/6/2022, Receipt No. ACACDC-34433583) filed by defendant Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (McLaughlin, Nicole)
December 7, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Daniel J. Oates to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Starbucks Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34433583) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case information is incomplete. DJ and MJ initials missing on application and proposed order. Please note DJ and MJ Notice of Assignment, dated 10/11/22, Dkt. 5. (lt)
December 6, 2022 Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Daniel J. Oates to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Starbucks Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34433583) filed by defendant Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (McLaughlin, Nicole)
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court hereby discharges the Order to Show Cause dated November 17, 2022 #10 . IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
December 1, 2022 Filing 12 DECLARATION of Eric Everett Hawes re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Order to Show Cause,, #10 previously filed 11/28/2022 with item 11 filed by Plaintiff JRUCW, Inc.. (Hawes, Eric)
November 28, 2022 Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiffs MIRABUX, Inc., JRUCW, Inc., KSTAR, Inc., JRUCW Pizza, Inc. upon Starbucks Corporation waiver sent by Plaintiff on 11/22/2022, answer due 1/23/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Nicole M. McLauglin. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Hawes, Eric)
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 11/28/2022 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
October 21, 2022 Filing 9 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by defendant Starbucks Corporation. (McLaughlin, Nicole)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
October 11, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
October 11, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
October 11, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (sh)
October 11, 2022 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation, a Washington Corporation (McLaughlin, Nicole)
October 11, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Starbucks Corporation, a Washington Corporation, identifying Brad D. Krasnoff, Bankruptcy Trustee for debtor Mirabux, Inc.. (McLaughlin, Nicole)
October 11, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation, a Washington Corporation. (McLaughlin, Nicole)
October 11, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from California State Court - Los Angeles County, case number 22stcv29355 Receipt No: ACACDC-34127036 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant Starbucks Corporation, a Washington Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit to Notice of Removal, #2 Declaration of Nicole McLaughlin in support of Removal of Action by defendant Starbucks Corporation) (Attorney Nicole Marie McLaughlin added to party Starbucks Corporation, a Washington Corporation(pty:dft))(McLaughlin, Nicole)
October 11, 2022 CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Starbucks Corporation., filed by Plaintiffs MIRABUX, Inc., JRUCW, Inc., KSTAR, Inc., JRUCW Pizza, Inc.[FILED IN STATE COURT 09/08/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JRUCW, Inc. et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JRUCW, Inc.
Represented By: Eric Hawes
Represented By: Eric Everett Hawes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JRUCW Pizza, Inc
Represented By: Eric Hawes
Represented By: Eric Everett Hawes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KSTAR, Inc.
Represented By: Eric Hawes
Represented By: Eric Everett Hawes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MIRABUX, Inc.
Represented By: Eric Hawes
Represented By: Eric Everett Hawes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Nicole Marie McLaughlin
Represented By: Daniel J. Oates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100, Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?