David Michael Woolman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: David Michael Woolman
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2022cv07431
Filed: October 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2022 Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attorney Michael K Marriott added to party Commissioner of Social Security Administration(pty:dft))(Marriott, Michael)
November 8, 2022 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff David Michael Woolman, upon Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration served on 10/19/2022, answer due 12/19/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. Veloz. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 executed summons, #2 executed summons)(Cervantes, Jane)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN upon filing of the complaint by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (dc)
October 12, 2022 Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Attorney General of the United States, United States Attorney's Office. (car)
October 12, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (car)
October 12, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff David Michael Woolman. (Attachments: #1 proposed summons usag, #2 proposed summons USAO)(Cervantes, Jane)
October 12, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff David Michael Woolman, (Cervantes, Jane)
October 12, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff David Michael Woolman. (Cervantes, Jane)
October 12, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34138157 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff David Michael Woolman. (Attorney Jane W. Cervantes added to party David Michael Woolman(pty:pla))(Cervantes, Jane)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Michael Woolman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Michael Woolman
Represented By: Jane W. Cervantes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Michael K Marriott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?