Benjamin Donel v. Greenbelt Resources Corporation et al
| Benjamin Donel |
| Greenbelt Resources Corporation, Darren Eng, CF Joseph Pivinski, Michael Nakamura, Floyd Butterfield and Does 1 to 25, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv07495 |
| October 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 - Notice of Removal - SEC Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTES OF NEW CASE STATUS CONFERENCE held before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The Court and counsel confer. For the reasons stated on the record the Court will issue an Order to Show Cause for Lack of Appearance on the Plaintiff, Benjamin Donel. Court Reporter: Kathy Stride. (aco) |
| Filing 10 SCHEDULING NOTICE: The Initial Status Conference previously scheduled for 11/28/2022 at 3:00 p.m. has been rescheduled to 11/29/2022 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 11/28/2022 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
|
Filing 8
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 7 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Michael Nakamura. (Robles, Albert) |
| Filing 6 Amended NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Michael Nakamura, identifying Greenbelt Resources Corporation, Darren Eng, Joseph Pivinski, Floyd Butterfield, Benjamin Donel, Law Offices of Benjamin Donel & Associates, DOCKNAK Global Solutions. (Robles, Albert) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): The caption of the Notice of Removal should match the caption of the State Court Complaint with all Plaintiffs and Defendants listed. Attachment 3 should be e-filed separately. The correct event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Notices. Attachment 6 Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately. The correct event category is located under Civil Events - Other Filings - Miscellaneous Filings. (car) |
| Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Floyd Butterfield, Does 1 to 25, inclusive, Darren Eng, Greenbelt Resources Corporation, Michael Nakamura, Joseph Pivinski. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Benjamin Donel. Filed in State Court on 12/23/2021 Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court West District, case number 21SMCV01982 Receipt No: ACACDC-34152911 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Michael Nakamura. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit State Court Docket, #3 Supplement Notice of interested Parties, #4 Declaration Declaration of Albert Robles, #5 Declaration Declaration of Michael Nakamura, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet) (Attorney Albert Robles added to party Michael Nakamura(pty:dft))(Robles, Albert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
