Courtney Costello et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
Plaintiff: Courtney Costello and Torey Costello
Defendant: City of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2022cv07520
Filed: October 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: John E McDermott
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
October 18, 2022 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant City of Los Angeles. (et)
October 18, 2022 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
October 18, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
October 18, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (et)
October 14, 2022 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Courtney Costello, Torey Costello. (Peacock, Gregory)
October 14, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Courtney Costello, Torey Costello, identifying City of Los Angeles. (Peacock, Gregory)
October 14, 2022 Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiffs Courtney Costello, Torey Costello.. (Peacock, Gregory)
October 14, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Courtney Costello, Torey Costello. (Peacock, Gregory)
October 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34156579 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Courtney Costello, Torey Costello. (Attorney Gregory Paul Peacock added to party Courtney Costello(pty:pla), Attorney Gregory Paul Peacock added to party Torey Costello(pty:pla))(Peacock, Gregory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Courtney Costello et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Courtney Costello
Represented By: Gregory Paul Peacock
Represented By: James Paul Segall-Gutierrez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Torey Costello
Represented By: James Paul Segall-Gutierrez
Represented By: Gregory Paul Peacock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Los Angeles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?