Christopher Robert Mack v. Kilolo Kijakazi
| Christopher Robert Mack |
| Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 2:2022cv07555 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV22-7555 RAO on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn)
|
|
Filing 12
CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Michael K Marriott added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Marriott, Michael)
|
|
Filing 11
CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Christopher Robert Mack. (Perales, Monica)
|
|
Filing 10
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Christopher Robert Mack, upon Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi served on 11/3/2022, answer due 2/1/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of Regional Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Perales, Monica)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. See Order for details. [Chambers courtesy copies not required.] (dml)
|
|
Filing 8
60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (dml)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE), #3 by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: The Court has reviewed the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (the "Request") and the documents submitted with it. On the question of indigency, the Court finds that the party who filed the Request is not able to pay the filing fees. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: The Request is GRANTED. (shb)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (et)
|
|
Filing 5
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Christopher Robert Mack. (Perales, Monica)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Christopher Robert Mack, (Perales, Monica)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Christopher Robert Mack. (Perales, Monica)
|
|
Filing 2
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Christopher Robert Mack. (Perales, Monica)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Christopher Robert Mack. (Attorney Monica Perales added to party Christopher Robert Mack (pty:pla))(Perales, Monica)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
