GovTV Streaming, LLC v. Netflix, Inc.
Petitioner: GOTV STREAMING, LLC and Netflix, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv07556
Filed: October 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Referring Judge: R Gary Klausner
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 42 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Aliza G. Carrano to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Netflix, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34479516) filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Dyer, Barrington)
December 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 41 AMENDED NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC, identifying GoTV Streaming, LLC; Netflix, Inc.; and Phunware, Inc.. (Stein, David)
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT NETFLIX, INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #39 by Judge R. Gary Klausner. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: Defendant Netflix, Inc.'s deadline to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is extended to December 27, 2022. Further extension disfavored. The OSC #31 is discharged. IT IS SO ORDERED. (rolm)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 39 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to 12/28/2022 re Amended Complaint/Petition #30 filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 12/27/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Barrington Dyer ISO Deft Netflix, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to First Amended Complaint, #2 Proposed Order) (Dyer, Barrington)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 38 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc., (Dyer, Barrington)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 37 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Shelby Anissa Palmer counsel for Defendant Netflix, Inc.. Adding Shelby A. Palmer as counsel of record for Defendant Netflix, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. (Attorney Shelby Anissa Palmer added to party Netflix, Inc.(pty:dft))(Palmer, Shelby)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 36 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Barrington E Dyer counsel for Defendant Netflix, Inc.. Adding Barrington Dyer as counsel of record for Defendant Netflix, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Netflix, Inc.. (Attorney Barrington E Dyer added to party Netflix, Inc.(pty:dft))(Dyer, Barrington)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 35 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLCto Order to Show Cause, #31 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Stein, David)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 34 AMENDED ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) 32. The document(s) is STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order for the following reason(s): Local Rule 8-3 does not apply to answers, replies or other responses to cross-claims, counterclaims, third-party complaints or any amended or supplemental pleadings. Further, the Stipulation is NOT a proper response to the pending Order to Show Cause 31 issued on November 16, 2022. Counsel's response remains pending. (jre)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #32 . The document(s) is STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order for the following reason(s): Local Rule 8-3 does not apply to answers, replies or other responses to cross-claims, counterclaims, third-party complaints or any amended or supplemental pleadings. Further, the Stipulation is in a proper response to the pending Order to Show Cause #31 issued on November 16, 2022. Counsel's response remains pending. (jre)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 32 (DOCUMENT STRICKEN. See Order at #33 .) - Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Netflix, Inc. answer now due 12/28/2022, re Amended Complaint/Petition #30 filed by Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Stein, David) Modified on 11/18/2022 (jre).
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MINUTES (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing by 11/25/2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to certain defendant/s. (See Civil Minutes for further specifics). (jp)
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Netflix, Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC(Stein, David)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner granting #23 Non-Resident Attorney Scott W Clark APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC, designating David M Stein as local counsel. (jp)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner granting #22 Non-Resident Attorney Michael D McBride APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC, designating David M Stein as local counsel. (jp)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner granting #17 Non-Resident Attorney Steven T Jugle APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC, designating David M Stein as local counsel. (jp)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner granting #16 Non-Resident Attorney Masood Anjom APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC, designating David M Stein as local counsel. (jp)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner granting #15 Non-Resident Attorney Justin Y Chen APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC, designating David M Stein as local counsel. (jp)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner granting #14 Non-Resident Attorney Amir H Alavi APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC, designating David M Stein as local counsel. (jp)
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Scott W. Clark to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34254365) filed by Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stein, David)
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael D. McBride to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34254003) filed by Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stein, David)
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC, upon Defendant Netflix, Inc. served on 10/25/2022, answer due 11/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John Montijo, Intake Specialist with registered agent CT Corporation System in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Stein, David)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-07556 RGK(SHKx). (rn)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Masood Anjom to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34190871) #16 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Justin Y. Chen to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34190746) #15 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Steven T. Jugle to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34190926) #17 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Amir H. Alavi to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34190269) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Other error(s) with document(s): Please note that electronic, image or stamp signatures are not allowed for either applicant or local counsel. See Instructions for Applicants (1). (lt)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC (Stein, David)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Steven T. Jugle to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34190926) filed by plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stein, David)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Masood Anjom to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34190871) filed by Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stein, David)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Justin Y. Chen to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34190746) filed by Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order) (Stein, David)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Amir H. Alavi to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34190269) filed by Plaintiff GoTV Streaming, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order) (Stein, David)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Justin Chen on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Amir Alavi on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Masood Anjom on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Netflix, Inc. (et)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (et)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by GOTV STREAMING, LLC. (Stein, David)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff GOTV STREAMING, LLC, identifying Netflix, Inc.. (Stein, David)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff GOTV STREAMING, LLC. (Stein, David)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant GOTV STREAMING, LLC. (Stein, David)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34166476 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff GOTV STREAMING, LLC. (Attorney David M Stein added to party GOTV STREAMING, LLC(pty:bkmov))(Stein, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GovTV Streaming, LLC v. Netflix, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: GOTV STREAMING, LLC
Represented By: David M Stein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Netflix, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?