Marco Alejandro Diez v. Ur Jaddou
| Marco Alejandro Diez |
| Ur Jaddou |
| 2:2022cv07591 |
| October 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
| Naturalization Application |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Marco Alejandro Diez. (Wolfsdorf, Bernard) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Ur Jaddou answer now due 1/18/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by DEFENDANT Ur Jaddou.(Attorney Joanne I. Osinoff added to party Ur Jaddou(pty:dft))(Osinoff, Joanne) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Marco Alejandro Diez, upon Defendant Ur Jaddou served on 10/24/2022, answer due 12/23/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. Veloz, Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to E. Anderson, Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to K. Lusby, Process Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Wolfsdorf, Bernard) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
|
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ur Jaddou. (car) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Marco Alejandro Diez. (Wolfsdorf, Bernard) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Marco Alejandro Diez, identifying none. (Wolfsdorf, Bernard) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Marco Alejandro Diez. (Wolfsdorf, Bernard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34170973 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Marco Alejandro Diez. (Attorney Bernard Pavel Wolfsdorf added to party Marco Alejandro Diez(pty:pla))(Wolfsdorf, Bernard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marco Alejandro Diez v. Ur Jaddou | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marco Alejandro Diez | |
| Represented By: | Bernard Pavel Wolfsdorf |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ur Jaddou | |
| Represented By: | OIL-DCS Trial Attorney |
| Represented By: | Joanne I. Osinoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
