Lizbeth Navarro v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Lizbeth Navarro |
| Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv07627 |
| October 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Charles F Eick |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTES OF Mandatory Scheduling Conference held before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The parties filed a notice of settlement on 12/1/2022 #12 . With the consent of the parties, this action is therefore dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. For 90 days from the date of this order, the Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this order and to reopen the action nunc pro tunc on motion of any party. By operation of this order and without further court action, the dismissal in this case will convert to a dismissal with prejudice on the 91st day, absent a timely motion to vacate and reopen. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Katherine Stride. (gk) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 days, filed by Plaintiff Lizbeth Navarro.. (Jacobson, Kevin) |
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The Court sets an in-person Mandatory Scheduling Conference set for hearing on December 2, 2022 at 8:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. The parties shall file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by November 22, 2022. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jgr)
|
|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (sh) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.[FILED IN STATE COURT 10/18/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Ford Motor Company.Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Lizbeth Navarro.[FILED IN STATE COURT 09/19/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY, identifying Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Matthew M Proudfoot on behalf of Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Matthew M. Proudfoot re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 22GDCV00606 Receipt No: ACACDC-34180224 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Summons & Complaint - State Court, #2 Answer to Complaint - State Court) (Attorney Matthew M Proudfoot added to party FORD MOTOR COMPANY(pty:dft))(Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
