Kevin Lofton v. US Department of the Treasury
Kevin Lofton |
US Department of the Treasury |
2:2022cv07656 |
October 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
John E McDermott |
Alka Sagar |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant US Department of the Treasury. (hr) |
Filing 11 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #2 by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: The Request is GRANTED. (rolm) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg) |
Filing 9 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:22-cv-07334 SPG(ASx). Case transferred from Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott to Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-07656 SPG(ASx). Signed by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett (rn) |
Filing 8 Letter re Demand for Payment filed by Plaintiff Kevin Lofton. (jp) |
Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Kevin Lofton, re Standing Order #6 served on 10/26/2022. (jp) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi) |
Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (car) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Kevin Lofton. (car) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant US Department of the Treasury. Case assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, filed by Plaintiff Kevin Lofton. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kevin Lofton v. US Department of the Treasury | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kevin Lofton | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: US Department of the Treasury | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.