Vampire Family Brands, LLC v. Haribo GmbH and Co. KG et al
| Vampire Family Brands, LLC |
| Haribo GmbH & Co. KG, Haribo Holding GmbH & CO. KG,, Rigo Trading, S.A., Haribo of America, Inc., Haribo GmbH and Co. KG, Haribo Holding GmbH and CO. KG and Does 1-20 |
| 2:2022cv07680 |
| October 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer GRANTING Stipulation to Extend Defendant Haribo of America, Inc's Time to Respond to Complaint #20 until 2/13/2023. (jp)
|
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Haribo GmbH and Co. KG, Haribo Holding GmbH and CO. KG, Haribo of America, Inc., Rigo Trading, S.A., identifying Haribo GmbH & Co. KG, Haribo Holding GmbH & Co. KG, RiGO Trading S.A., Haribo of America, Inc., Haribo International GmbH, Haribo Luxemburg S.a.r.l., Dr. Hans Reigel Holding GmbH, and Paul Riegal Holding GmbH & Co. KG. (Attorney Bobby A. Ghajar added to party Haribo GmbH and Co. KG (pty:dft), Attorney Bobby A. Ghajar added to party Haribo Holding GmbH and CO. KG (pty:dft), Attorney Bobby A. Ghajar added to party Rigo Trading, S.A.(pty:dft))(Ghajar, Bobby) |
| Filing 20 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to February 13, 2023 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Haribo of America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Bobby A. Ghajar added to party Haribo of America, Inc. (pty:dft))(Ghajar, Bobby) |
| Filing 19 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Vampire Family Brands, LLC. upon Haribo of America, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 11/14/2022, answer due 2/13/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Laura M. Schaefer. (Machat, Michael) |
| Filing 18 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Vampire Family Brands, LLC. upon Rigo Trading, S.A. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 11/14/2022, answer due 2/13/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Laura M. Schaefer. (Machat, Michael) |
| Filing 17 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Vampire Family Brands, LLC. upon Haribo Holding GmbH and CO. KG waiver sent by Plaintiff on 11/14/2022, answer due 2/13/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Laura M. Schaefer. (Machat, Michael) |
| Filing 16 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Vampire Family Brands, LLC. upon Haribo GmbH and Co. KG waiver sent by Plaintiff on 11/14/2022, answer due 2/13/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Laura M. Schaefer. (Machat, Michael) |
| Filing 15 Summons Returned Unexecuted filed by Plaintiff Vampire Family Brands, LLC. as to Haribo of America, Inc.. (Machat, Michael) |
| Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Haribo GmbH and Co. KG, Haribo Holding GmbH and CO. KG, Haribo of America, Inc., Rigo Trading, S.A.. (jp) |
|
Filing 13
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:21-cv-05560 DSF(JCx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero and Judge R. Gary Klausner to Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-07680 DSF(JCx). Signed by Judge Dale S. Fischer (rn)
|
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Vampire Family Brands, LLC. (Machat, Michael) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Vampire Family Brands, LLC. Related Case(s): 2:21-cv-05560-DSF-JC (Machat, Michael) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Vampire Family Brands, LLC. (Machat, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Vampire Family Brands, LLC, (Machat, Michael) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Vampire Family Brands, LLC (Machat, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Vampire Family Brands, LLC. (Machat, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34191165 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Vampire Family Brands, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit) (Attorney Michael Machat added to party Vampire Family Brands, LLC(pty:pla))(Machat, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
