Stratia Inc. v. Liquid Gold Hair, LLC et al
| Stratia Inc. |
| Liquid Gold Hair, LLC and Liquid Gold Hair Products, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv07684 |
| October 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants All Defendants, (Hughley Smith, Tyra) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. Proposed document was not submitted or was not submitted as a separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Defendant Liquid Gold Hair Products, Inc., Liquid Gold Hair, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 2/17/2023 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Points and Authorities in Support of Motion, #2 Declaration of Laniece Okwara, #3 Exhibit In support of Motion) (Hughley Smith, Tyra) |
| Filing 18 REFUND OF $402.00 made payable on 12/05/2022 to Barbara Noble for payment made on 10/20/2022 under EDS-221020-000-5654. Re: APPLICATION for Refund of Fees Paid Re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 #13 . (rdj) |
Filing 17
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court finds that the requested extension #16 should beGRANTED. Accordingly, Defendants Liquid Gold Hair, LLC and Liquid Gold Hair Products, Inc.'s time to respond to the Complaint is extended to 12/15/2022. (gk)
|
| Filing 16 Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to 12/15/2022 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Liquid Gold Hair Products, Inc., Liquid Gold Hair, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order) (Attorney Tyra Hughley Smith added to party Liquid Gold Hair Products, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Tyra Hughley Smith added to party Liquid Gold Hair, LLC(pty:dft)) (Hughley Smith, Tyra) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Stratia Inc., upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon LaNiece Okwara, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Johnson, Brent) |
|
Filing 14
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 13 APPLICATION for Refund of Fees Paid Re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Stratia Inc.. (Johnson, Brent) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Stratia Inc., identifying Alli Reed, CEO and Founder of Stratia Inc.. (Johnson, Brent) |
| Filing 11 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Stratia Inc.. (Johnson, Brent) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment 1 Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately. The correct event category is located under Civil Events - Other Filings - Miscellaneous Filings. Attachment 2 should be e-filed separately under Civil Events Other Filings Notices. Attachment 5 is the AO 120 Report should not have been attached to the complaint. The Clerk has corrected by re-docketing the AO120 Report to reflect the correct event. (car) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Liquid Gold Hair, LLC. (car) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Liquid Gold Hair Products, Inc. (car) |
| Filing 7 [DOCKETED BY THE CLERK TO REFLECT THE CORRECT EVENT] REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Stratia Inc. (car) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (car) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Stratia Inc.. (Johnson, Brent) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Stratia Inc.. (Johnson, Brent) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34192394 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Stratia Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Plaintiff's Notice of Interested Parties & Disclosure Statement, #3 Summons Liquid Gold Hair, LLC, #4 Summons Liquid Gold Hair Products, Inc., #5 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark) (Attorney Brent E Johnson added to party Stratia Inc.(pty:pla))(Johnson, Brent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
