Conjunction Junction LLC v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes et al
| conjunction junction llc |
| City of Rancho Palos Verdes, United States Postal Service, Does 1-100, Maricela Sagarnaga Guillean and Steven Giang |
| 2:2022cv07688 |
| October 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. An Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution was issued by the Court on February 2, 2023 ordering Plaintiff either to: (i) respond in writing no later than February 9, 2023 as to why the matter should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. A response was filed by Plaintiff on February 3, 2023 (Dkt. 18) stating proof(s) of service would be filed (not date given). The Order to Show Cause re Dismissal was continued to February 21, 2023. As of date, no proof(s) of service have been filed indicating that the summons and complaint have been served on Defendant(s) or their respective counsel. Therefore, the Court dismisses the matter for lack of prosecution and failure to follow the Court's Orders. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (yl)
|
|
Filing 19
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION (DKT. #17 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court issued an Order to Show Cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution (Dkt. #17 ) (the "OSC"). Plaintiff was directed to file a response to the OSC no later than February 9, 2023. Upon review of the timely-filed Response (Dkt. #18 ), the Court grants in part the request for additional time to serve Defendant. On or before February 21, 2023, Plaintiff shall serve all Defendants and file a proof of service. In light of the foregoing, the OSC is continued to February 21, 2023. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 18 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Conjunction Junction LLCto Order to Show Cause,,,, #17 (Jacobs, Richard) |
|
Filing 17
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than February 9, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In the absence of showing good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served within 90 days after the filing of the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). In light of the filing of the complaint date of October 21, 2022, proof(s) of service were due by January 21, 2023. An action may also be dismissed prior to such time if the Plaintiff fails diligently to prosecute the action. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of a responsive pleading to the complaint and/or proof(s) of service, which indicates proper service in full compliance with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. IT IS SO ORDERED. (rolm)
|
| Filing 16 Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States Postal Service. (yl) |
| Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Steven Giang. (yl) |
| Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Maricela Sagarnaga Guillean. (yl) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant City of Rancho Palos Verdes. (yl) |
| Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Conjunction Junction LLC. (Jacobs, Richard) |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Conjunction Junction LLC. (Jacobs, Richard) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Conjunction Junction LLC. (Jacobs, Richard) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Conjunction Junction LLC. (Jacobs, Richard) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (hc)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Conjunction Junction LLC, identifying Sovereign Asset Managers, LLC. (Jacobs, Richard) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Conjunction Junction LLC. (Jacobs, Richard) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (sh) |
| Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (sh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-34193763 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff conjunction junction llc. (Attorney Richard B Jacobs added to party conjunction junction llc(pty:pla))(Jacobs, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
