Abet Security Services, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles et al
| Abet Security Services, Inc. |
| City of Los Angeles, Det. Benjamin Jones, Ofc. Eric Rose and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv07713 |
| October 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Abet Security Services, Inc. identifying none as Corporate Parent. (Friedman, Jerold) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Abet Security Services, Inc.. (Friedman, Jerold) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-34199287 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Abet Security Services, Inc.. (Attorney Jerold D Friedman added to party Abet Security Services, Inc.(pty:pla))(Friedman, Jerold) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
