Micah Anderson v. Technologies Zoom Corporation et al
| Micah Anderson |
| Technologies Zoom Corporation and Erick Wuan |
| 2:2022cv07793 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. The following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order for the following reason(s): Case was dismissed and closed on 11/9/2022 denying the application to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Accordingly, Plaintiff's request is stricken as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jre)
|
| Filing 12 (DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER #13 .) - REQUESTING a Extension of Time and Information on ADA Interpreters for Pretrial and Deaf and Blino filed by plaintiff Micah Anderson. (jp) Modified on 12/8/2022 (jre). |
|
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner re REQUEST for Extension of Time to File #10 . The document(s) is STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order for the following reason(s): Case was dismissed and closed on 11/9/2022 denying the application to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Accordingly, Plaintiff's request is stricken as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jre)
|
| Filing 10 REQUEST for Extension of Time to Filing filed by plaintiff Micah Anderson. (jp) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner DENYING REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #3 . FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated.) See Order for further specifics. (jp)
|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Defendant shall file a Certification and Notice of Interested Parties with 5 days from the receipt of this form. Additionally, Plaintiff shall file the proper Summons forms as noted in the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies #2 . (jre) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Complaint - (Discovery), #1 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. Other error(s) with document(s): Summons must be prepared using an approved form, Local Rule 3-1 no Cover Sheet, no Form AO-120. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, filed by plaintiff Micah Anderson. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Technologies Zoom Corporation, Erick Wuan. Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth., filed by plaintiff Micah Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
