Luis R. Avalos v. Travon Tate et al
Luis R. Avalos |
Travon Tate, Tammy Chism and Does 1 to 10, inclusive |
2:2022cv07848 |
October 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Otis D Wright |
Rent Lease & Ejectment |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Receipt of Letter of Transmittal- Remand to Superior Court (rolm) |
Filing 13 TRANSMITTAL of documents to LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT,COMPTON, NO. 22CMUD00893. (lc) |
Filing 12 ORDER SUA SPONTE REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Case Remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Compton, Case number 22CMUD00893, Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (lc) |
Filing 11 ORDER DENYING REQUESTS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #3 #4 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: As explained in the attached statement, the Request(s) is denied because The District Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. This case is REMANDED to state court. (lc) |
Filing 10 ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for January 9, 2023 at 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc) |
Filing 9 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR MSJs. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (sh) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION to Proceed In District Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs filed by Defendant Travon Tate. (sh) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed In District Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs filed by Defendant Tammy Chism. (sh) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Tammy Chism, Travon Tate, (sh) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA County of Los Angeles, case number 22CMUD00893 with copy of summons and complaint.[STATE COURT FILE DATE NOT LEGIBLE SUBMITTED ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT A] Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick., filed by Defendant Tammy Chism, Travon Tate. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sh) |
CONFOREMD FILED COPY OF ANSWER to COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Tammy Chism. [FILED IN STATE COURT 09/16/2022 SUBMITTED AS EXHIBIT A ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.