Creekview IP, LLC v. Legrand North America, LLC
| Creekview IP, LLC |
| Legrand North America, LLC |
| 2:2022cv07909 |
| October 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Legrand North America, LLC answer now due 1/20/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Creekview IP, LLC.(Ritcheson, Steven) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Creekview IP, LLC, upon Defendant Legrand North America, LLC served on 12/1/2022, answer due 12/22/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation (Sarai Marin, Process Specialist) in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Ritcheson, Steven) |
| Filing 8 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Legrand North America, LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Creekview IP, LLC. (Ritcheson, Steven) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Creekview IP, LLC identifying NONE as Corporate Parent. (Ritcheson, Steven) |
| Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Creekview IP, LLC. (Ritcheson, Steven) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Creekview IP, LLC. (Ritcheson, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34240337 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Creekview IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2) (Attorney Steven W Ritcheson added to party Creekview IP, LLC(pty:pla))(Ritcheson, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Creekview IP, LLC v. Legrand North America, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Creekview IP, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Steven W Ritcheson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Legrand North America, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
