Leah Ross v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB et al
| LEAH ROSS and David Ross |
| WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLEY AS TRUSTEE FOR VERUS SECURITIZATION TRUST 2020-NPL1, VERUS SECURITIZATION TRUST 2020-NPL1, VST 2020-NPL1 REO, LLC, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv07922 |
| October 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to VST 2020-NPL1 REO, LLC answer now due 1/19/2023; Verus Securitization Trust 2020-NPL1 answer now due 1/19/2023; Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB answer now due 1/19/2023, re Amended Complaint/Petition #12 filed by Defendants VST 2020-NPL1 REO, LLC; Verus Securitization Trust 2020-NPL1; Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION AND EXTENDING ALL DEFENDANTS TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT)(Gore, Rosty) |
| Filing 12 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by plaintiff Leah Ross, David Ross(Attorney Steven Y Han added to party David Ross(pty:pla))(Han, Steven) |
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order re Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The motion #7 is granted. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 14 days if she can do so consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b) and this Order. Failure to file a timely amended complaint will waive the right to do so. Leave to add new defendants or claims must be sought by a separate, properly noticed motion. (smo)
|
|
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth to Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:22-cv-07922 MCS(RAOx). (rn) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #7 filed by Defendants VST 2020-NPL1 REO, LLC, Verus Securitization Trust 2020-NPL1, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB. (Gore, Rosty) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants VST 2020-NPL1 REO, LLC, Verus Securitization Trust 2020-NPL1, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB. Motion set for hearing on 12/15/2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF ROSTY G. GORE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT) (Gore, Rosty) |
| Filing 6 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Mase, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANTS VST 2020-NPL1 REO, LLC, Verus Securitization Trust 2020-NPL1, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, identifying WSFS Financial Corporation; Verus Securitization Trust 2020-NPL1, Wilmington Savings Fund, FSB, as Trustee. (Mase, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, VST 2020-NPL1 REO, LLC, Verus Securitization Trust 2020-NPL1, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Leah Ross. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/30/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants VERUS SECURITIZATION TRUST 2020-NPL1, VST 2020-NPL1 REO, LLC, WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLEY AS TRUSTEE FOR VERUS SECURITIZATION TRUST 2020-NPL1. (Mase, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22SMCV01739 Receipt No: ACACDC-34245973 - Fee: $402, filed by DEFENDANTS VST 2020-NPL1 REO, LLC, VERUS SECURITIZATION TRUST 2020-NPL1, WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLEY AS TRUSTEE FOR VERUS SECURITIZATION TRUST 2020-NPL1. (Attorney Andrew Jonathan Mase added to party VERUS SECURITIZATION TRUST 2020-NPL1(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew Jonathan Mase added to party VST 2020-NPL1 REO, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew Jonathan Mase added to party WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLEY AS TRUSTEE FOR VERUS SECURITIZATION TRUST 2020-NPL1(pty:dft))(Mase, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
