Yvonne Bernard v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Plaintiff: Yvonne Bernard
Defendant: CHASE BANK USA, N.A. n/k/a JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Counter Claimant: Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Case Number: 2:2022cv07925
Filed: October 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2022 Filing 16 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/20/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 2/3/2023 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti)
December 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
December 16, 2022 Filing 14 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - REASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO JUDGE GEE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Please take notice that this action has been reassigned to the HONORABLE DOLLY M. GEE, United States District Judge, pursuant to the Order re Reassign Pursuant to General Order 12-02 filed on 12/12/2022. The case number will now read CV 22-7925-DMG (SKx). Additional information about Judge Gee's procedures and schedules is available on the court's website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov. See document for further details. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
December 15, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick to Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:22-cv-07925 DMG(SKx). (rn)
December 14, 2022 Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , COUNTERCLAIM against Yvonne Bernard filed by Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A..(Armstrong, Daniel)
December 14, 2022 Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel A. Armstrong counsel for Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A.. Adding Daniel A. Armstrong as counsel of record for Chase Bank USA, N.A., n/k/a JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A., n/k/a JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attorney Daniel A. Armstrong added to party Chase Bank USA, N.A. (pty:dft))(Armstrong, Daniel)
November 23, 2022 Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Alice Kwak counsel for Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A.. Adding Arjun P. Rao as counsel of record for Chase Bank USA, N.A., n/k/a JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A., n/k/a JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attorney Alice Kwak added to party Chase Bank USA, N.A. (pty:dft))(Kwak, Alice)
November 23, 2022 Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to filed by Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A..(Kwak, Alice)
November 4, 2022 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Yvonne Bernard, upon Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A. served on 11/2/2022, answer due 11/23/2022. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Martin, George)
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (See document for details) (vmun)
November 1, 2022 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A. (car)
November 1, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (Attachments: #1 CV11-C) (car)
October 31, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties (Martin, George)
October 31, 2022 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Yvonne Bernard. (Martin, George)
October 31, 2022 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Yvonne Bernard. (Martin, George)
October 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34247238 - Fee: $402. (Attorney George Thomas Martin, III added to party Yvonne Bernard(pty:pla))(Martin, George)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yvonne Bernard v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yvonne Bernard
Represented By: George Thomas Martin, III
Represented By: Nicholas J Bontrager
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHASE BANK USA, N.A. n/k/a JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Represented By: Alice Kwak
Represented By: Daniel A. Armstrong
Represented By: Arjun P Rao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?