Frank Mechaly v. Daniel Schmitt and Co. et al
Frank Mechaly |
Daniel Schmitt and Co. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
2:2022cv07954 |
November 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maria A Audero |
Dale S Fischer |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The stipulation is denied. #17 The motion #12 is taken under submission. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 17 First STIPULATION to Continue Motion to Dismiss from 01/23/23 to 02/13/23 Re: Text Only Scheduling Notice, 13 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss COMPLAINT UNDER FEDERAL RULE 12(B)(6) AND 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) OR, ALTERNATIVELY, COMPEL ARBITRATION #12 filed by Plaintiff Frank Mechaly. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Perry, Michael) |
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Daniel Schmitt and Co., (Attachments: #1 Supplement Proof of Service)(Nilsen, Ryan) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. A notice of interested parties shall be filed no later than 5 days from entry of this Order. #12 and #14 (rfi) |
Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Under FRCP Rule 12(B)(6) and 28 USC 1404(a) or, Alternative, Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant Daniel Schmitt and Co #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No notice of interested parties. (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
Filing 13 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer re Motion to Dismiss COMPLAINT UNDER FEDERAL RULE 12(B)(6) AND 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) OR, ALTERNATIVELY, COMPEL ARBITRATION #12 . The Court, on its own motion, sets the matter for hearing on 1/23/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss COMPLAINT UNDER FEDERAL RULE 12(B)(6) AND 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) OR, ALTERNATIVELY, COMPEL ARBITRATION filed by Defendant Daniel Schmitt and Co.. Motion set for hearing on 1/17/2023 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2) (Attorney Paloma Isabel Moreno-Acosta added to party Daniel Schmitt and Co.(pty:dft)) (Moreno-Acosta, Paloma) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Frank Mechaly, upon Defendant Daniel Schmitt and Co. served on 11/8/2022, answer due 11/29/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Daniel Schmitt/President in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Perry, Michael) |
Filing 10 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Frank Mechaly. (Perry, Michael) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Daniel Schmitt and Co. (ghap) |
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (ghap) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, identifying Daniel Schmitt & Co.. (Perry, Michael) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Frank Mechaly. (Perry, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34252376 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Frank Mechaly. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Attorney Michael J Perry added to party Frank Mechaly(pty:pla))(Perry, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.