Fatemeh Dabirian v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
| Fatemeh Dabirian |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Jennifer B. Higgins and Ted H. Kim |
| 2:2022cv07974 |
| November 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STATUS REPORT ON SERVICE OF PROCESS IN CIVIL ACTION filed by Plaintiff Fatemeh Dabirian. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit #1)(Sedaghat, Shawn) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Fatemeh Dabirian, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to R. Childvess. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to R. Childvess. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to R. Childvess, Civil Process Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. PROOF OF SERVICE UPON CIVIL PROCESS CLERK, OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY (Sedaghat, Shawn) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Fatemeh Dabirian, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to R. Childvess. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to R. Childvess. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to R. Childvess, Civil Process Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Sedaghat, Shawn) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Fatemeh Dabirian, upon Defendant Ted H. Kim served on 11/16/2022, answer due 1/17/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to R. Childvess. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to R. Childvess. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to R. Childvess, Civil Process Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Sedaghat, Shawn) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Fatemeh Dabirian, upon Defendant Jennifer B. Higgins served on 11/16/2022, answer due 1/17/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to R. Childvess. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to R. Childvess. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to R. Childvess, Civil Process Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Sedaghat, Shawn) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Fatemeh Dabirian, upon Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas served on 11/16/2022, answer due 1/17/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to R. Childvess. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to R. Childvess. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to R. Childvess, Civil Process Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Sedaghat, Shawn) |
Filing 7
ORDER RE: STATUS REPORT ON SERVICE OF PROCESS IN CIVIL ACTION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. In order to properly administer the Direct Assignment Program and advance this action in compliance with this Court's deadlines, Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit a report regarding the status of service of process in the action. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing a statement (not to exceed 3 pages) plus proof of service of process by or before December 19, 2022. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Jennifer B. Higgins, Ted H. Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by plaintiff Fatemeh Dabirian. (Sedaghat, Shawn) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Fatemeh Dabirian, (Sedaghat, Shawn) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Fatemeh Dabirian. (Sedaghat, Shawn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34256089 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Fatemeh Dabirian. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit #1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit #2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit #3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit #4) (Attorney Shawn Sedaghat added to party Fatemeh Dabirian(pty:pla))(Sedaghat, Shawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
