Teresa Ortiz De Lopez v. Kilolo Kijakazi
| Teresa Ortiz De Lopez |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 2:2022cv08008 |
| November 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| George H Wu |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Jennifer Lee Tarn added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Tarn, Jennifer) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Teresa Ortiz De Lopez, upon Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi served on 11/8/2022, answer due 2/6/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Deborah L. Stachel, Regional Chief Counsel, Office of the Regional Chief Counsel-Region IX. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (Koenig, Andrew) |
Filing 7
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. [See Order for details.] (san)
|
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Teresa Ortiz De Lopez, identifying Joseph Graham. (Koenig, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Teresa Ortiz De Lopez. (Koenig, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Teresa Ortiz De Lopez. (Koenig, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34261270 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Teresa Ortiz De Lopez. (Attorney Andrew Thomas Koenig added to party Teresa Ortiz De Lopez(pty:pla))(Koenig, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Teresa Ortiz De Lopez v. Kilolo Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Teresa Ortiz De Lopez | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Thomas Koenig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Lee Tarn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
