D. Jacobs v. Eric Michael Garcetti et al
| D. JACOBS |
| ERIC MICHAEL GARCETTU, PAUL KREKORIAN, ROBERT BLUMENFIELD, MONICA RODRIGUEZ, MARQUEECE HARRIS-DAWSON, MARK RIDLEY-THOMAS, JOHN LEE, MITCH O'FARRELL, KEVIN DE LEON, MONIQUE CONTRERAS, Eric Michael Garcetti, Mitch O Farrell and One Hundred Unknown Named Defendants |
| 2:2022cv08010 |
| November 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Karen E Scott |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by PLAINTIFF D. JACOBS. (Yagman, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF D. JACOBS, (Yagman, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by PLAINTIFF D. JACOBS. Related Case(s): 20-2291-DOC; 21-6003-DOC; 21-6109-DOC; 21-7596-DOC; 21-7305-DOC; 21-8783-DOC; 21-09112-DOC; and 22-3533 (Yagman, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff D. JACOBS. (Yagman, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by PLAINTIFF D. JACOBS. (Yagman, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by PLAINTIFF D. JACOBS. (Attorney Stephen Yagman added to party D. JACOBS(pty:pla))(Yagman, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
