118 Ava LLC v. Christopher Hunter et al
Plaintiff: 118 Ava LLC
Defendant: Pauline Clay Hunter and Christopher Hunter
Case Number: 2:2022cv08048
Filed: November 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
Presiding Judge: Dean D Pregerson
Referring Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2022 Filing 15 Receipt of G-17 (02/19) LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT received on November 16, 2022 by Kathy Morales, Deputy (shb)
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #11 filed by Pauline Clay Hunter, Christopher Hunter. CCA # 22-56115. A review of this court's docket reflects that the filing and docketing fees for this appeal remain due. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay to the district court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal and file in this court proof of such payment or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [See Order for further information.] (car)
November 29, 2022 Filing 13 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 22-56115 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #11 as to Plaintiffs Christopher Hunter, Pauline Clay Hunter. (shb)
November 22, 2022 Filing 12 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #11 by Defendants Christopher Hunter, Pauline Clay Hunter. [Notice of the filing is sent to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.] (car) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/28/2022: #1 Proposed Order) (car).
November 22, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by Defendants Christopher Hunter, Pauline Clay Hunter. Appeal of Order to Remand Case to State Court, #8 Filed On: 11/8/2022; Entered On: 11/8/2022; [Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis is being sent to the 9th CCA.] (car)
November 14, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Pauline Clay Hunter. Related Case(s): 2:22-cv-03324 JAK(SPx) & 2:22-cr-00212 JAK (rn)
November 8, 2022 Filing 9 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court. (shb)
November 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT AND DENYING EX PARTEAPPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The court DENIES Defendants Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order and REMANDS this action to Los Angeles County Superior Court. Case number 22STUD04400. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (shb)
November 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:15-cv-01056 DDP(JPRx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams and Judge Josephine L. Staton to Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-08048 DDP(JPRx). Signed by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (rn)
November 8, 2022 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
November 8, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
November 8, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (sh)
November 7, 2022 Filing 3 EMERGENCY EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Defendants Christopher Hunter, Pauline Clay Hunter. (jp)
November 3, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Pauline Clay Hunter, (sh)
November 3, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA County of Los Angeles, case number 22STUD04400 with copy of summons and complaint.[CONFRMED EFILED IN STATE COURT 08/08/2022] Case assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Paul A. Abrams., filed by Defendants Pauline Clay Hunter, Christopher Hunter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: 118 Ava LLC v. Christopher Hunter et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: 118 Ava LLC
Represented By: Luat T Cao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pauline Clay Hunter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Hunter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?