Marcus Alexander Murchinson v. City of Sierra Madre et al
Marcus Alexander Murchinson |
City of Sierra Madre, Officer Shaw, Grant Cadzow and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2022cv08099 |
November 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
John E McDermott |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER RE STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation #13 , the Court orders that the deadline for Plaintiff MARCUS MURCHINSON to amend the complaint against Defendants CITY OF SIERRA MADRE; OFFICER SHAW; and GRANT CADZOW shall be extended to 1/9/2023. (gk) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint filed by defendants Grant Cadzow, City of Sierra Madre, Officer Shaw. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Re Stip for Ext to Amend Pltf's Complaint)(Attorney Daenara Burgess added to party Grant Cadzow(pty:dft), Attorney Daenara Burgess added to party City of Sierra Madre(pty:dft), Attorney Daenara Burgess added to party Officer Shaw(pty:dft))(Burgess, Daenara) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Marcus Alexander Murchinson, upon Defendant Grant Cadzow served on 11/24/2022, answer due 12/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Kim, James) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Marcus Alexander Murchinson, upon Defendant Officer Shaw served on 11/24/2022, answer due 12/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Laura Aguilar-City Clerk in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kim, James) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Marcus Alexander Murchinson, upon Defendant City of Sierra Madre served on 11/24/2022, answer due 12/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Laura Aguilar-City Clerk in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kim, James) |
Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Grant Cadzow, City of Sierra Madre, Officer Shaw. (lh) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (lh) |
Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Marcus Alexander Murchinson, (Kim, James) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Marcus Alexander Murchinson. (Kim, James) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Marcus Alexander Murchinson. (Kim, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34279953 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Marcus Alexander Murchinson. (Attorney James Do Hyung Kim added to party Marcus Alexander Murchinson(pty:pla))(Kim, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.