Marcus Alexander Murchinson v. City of Sierra Madre et al
Plaintiff: Marcus Alexander Murchinson
Defendant: City of Sierra Madre, Officer Shaw, Grant Cadzow and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2022cv08099
Filed: November 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: John E McDermott
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER RE STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation #13 , the Court orders that the deadline for Plaintiff MARCUS MURCHINSON to amend the complaint against Defendants CITY OF SIERRA MADRE; OFFICER SHAW; and GRANT CADZOW shall be extended to 1/9/2023. (gk)
December 13, 2022 Filing 13 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint filed by defendants Grant Cadzow, City of Sierra Madre, Officer Shaw. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Re Stip for Ext to Amend Pltf's Complaint)(Attorney Daenara Burgess added to party Grant Cadzow(pty:dft), Attorney Daenara Burgess added to party City of Sierra Madre(pty:dft), Attorney Daenara Burgess added to party Officer Shaw(pty:dft))(Burgess, Daenara)
December 13, 2022 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Marcus Alexander Murchinson, upon Defendant Grant Cadzow served on 11/24/2022, answer due 12/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Kim, James)
December 13, 2022 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Marcus Alexander Murchinson, upon Defendant Officer Shaw served on 11/24/2022, answer due 12/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Laura Aguilar-City Clerk in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kim, James)
December 13, 2022 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Marcus Alexander Murchinson, upon Defendant City of Sierra Madre served on 11/24/2022, answer due 12/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Laura Aguilar-City Clerk in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kim, James)
November 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
November 8, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Grant Cadzow, City of Sierra Madre, Officer Shaw. (lh)
November 8, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
November 8, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
November 8, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (lh)
November 4, 2022 Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Marcus Alexander Murchinson, (Kim, James)
November 4, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Marcus Alexander Murchinson. (Kim, James)
November 4, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Marcus Alexander Murchinson. (Kim, James)
November 4, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34279953 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Marcus Alexander Murchinson. (Attorney James Do Hyung Kim added to party Marcus Alexander Murchinson(pty:pla))(Kim, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marcus Alexander Murchinson v. City of Sierra Madre et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcus Alexander Murchinson
Represented By: James Do Hyung Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Sierra Madre
Represented By: Daenara Burgess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Shaw
Represented By: Daenara Burgess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Grant Cadzow
Represented By: Daenara Burgess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?