Theresa Brooke v. Palmdale MMP LLC
| Theresa Brooke |
| Palmdale MMP LLC |
| 2:2022cv08107 |
| November 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE #22 . Having received and reviewed the Response of Plaintiff's counsel to the Court's December 28, 2022 Order to Show Cause #24 ,, along with Plaintiff's Case Statement #23 , the Court hereby DISCHARGES the Order to Show Cause. The parties should proceed with selecting a mediation date with Judge Wilner and must meet all mediation-related deadlines, including those found in the Order Granting Application for Stay and Early Mediation and any additional deadlines set by the Magistrate Judge or the District Judge. (lc)
|
| Filing 24 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Theresa Brooketo Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #22 (Strojnik, P) |
| Filing 23 STATEMENT Plaintiff's Case Statement filed by Plaintiff Theresa Brooke re: Order on Application to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-22) #21 . (Strojnik, P) |
|
Filing 22
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On December 13, 2022, the Court issued a signed ADA Disability Access Litigation Order Granting Application for Stay and Early Mediation #21 . Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing only, why Plaintiff has not filed a Case Statement and why the Court should not dismiss the case for failure to comply with Court orders. Plaintiff's response to this Order to Show Cause is due no later than January 4, 2023. Failure to timely and adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause in its entirety will result in dismissal of the case. (lc)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR STAY AND EARLY MEDIATION #18 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: This action is STAYED as to the entire case for a period of ninety (90) days. The ADR Procedure No. 1 is to be completed no later than 2/2/2023. (lc)
|
|
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court hereby CONTINUES the Scheduling Conference to April 4, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. The deadline for filing the Rule 26(f) Report is correspondingly continued. (lc)
|
| Filing 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #18 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed document was not submitted or was not submitted as a separate attachment. Missing corresponding proposed order form. Obtain form at court's website. Other error(s) with document(s): As an alternative, prepare and e-file a formal Notice of Lodging, to be docketed only under its specific event: Notice of Lodging, to which the formal proposed order is submitted as a Separate Attachment thereto.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 18 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Plaintiff Theresa Brooke. (Strojnik, P) |
| Filing 17 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. A ( Scheduling Conference set for 1/23/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. [See document for details and deadlines.] (es) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Palmdale MMP LLC.(Attorney Glenn Melbourne Hayden added to party Palmdale MMP LLC(pty:dft))(Hayden, Glenn) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act claim. The Court therefore DISMISSES this claim WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(4). [See document for details.] (es)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Theresa Brooketo Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,, #12 (Strojnik, P) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing No Later Than November 21,2022 why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and any other state law claim asserted in the Complaint. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims, if any, and the dismissal of that claim pursuant to 28 USC 1367(c) (lc)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: ORDER REGARDING PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. The Court finds that there is good cause to institute a limited scheduling order concerning basic case prosecution for cases under the Americans With Disabilities Act involving physical barriers in places of public accommodation. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC ENUMERATED REQUIREMENTS AND DEADLINES THEREIN). The failure to comply with this Order in a particular case will result in a sanction of $300.00 payable to the clerk of the court within two weeks of Plaintiff being given notice of noncompliance and dismissal for lack of prosecution. The Court finds these sanctions sufficient and necessary to deter violations of the Order and to achieve timely prosecution of these cases without unnecessary intervention by the Court. (lc)
|
| Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lc) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR MSJs. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who havepending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Palmdale MMP LLC. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (sh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Theresa Brooke. (Strojnik, P) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Theresa Brooke, (Strojnik, P) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Theresa Brooke. (Strojnik, P) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34280269 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Theresa Brooke. (Attorney P Kristofer Strojnik added to party Theresa Brooke(pty:pla))(Strojnik, P) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Theresa Brooke v. Palmdale MMP LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Theresa Brooke | |
| Represented By: | P Kristofer Strojnik |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Palmdale MMP LLC | |
| Represented By: | Glenn Melbourne Hayden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
