William Sebron King-Golding v. Kilolo Kijakazi
Plaintiff: William Sebron King-Golding
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 2:2022cv08116
Filed: November 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: Charles F Eick
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2023 Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 2:22-cv-08116 E on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. RE: Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (AUSA filers only) - Non-Final #12 , Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (non-AUSA) - Non-Final #11 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (rn)
December 29, 2022 Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Jennifer Lee Tarn added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Tarn, Jennifer)
December 8, 2022 Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff William Sebron King-Golding. (Kalagian, Marc)
December 8, 2022 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff William Sebron King-Golding, upon Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi served on 11/29/2022, answer due 2/27/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of Regional Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Kalagian, Marc)
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Plaintiff shall promptly serve the Summons and Complaint on defendant and shall file a proof of such service within 30 days of the date of this Order. IT IS ORDERED that defendant's time to plead to the complaint is extended such that defendant's pleading must be filed within 90 days of service of the complaint. Defendant shall file a transcript of the administrative proceedings at the same time that defendant pleads to the complaint. A paper copy of the transcript of the administrative proceedings must be submitted directly to chambers within 24 hours of the time defendant pleads to the complaint. Within 30 days of the filing of defendant's answer, the plaintiff shall file a motion for summary judgment or remand. Within 30 days of the filing of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment or remand, defendant shall file a motion for summary judgment or remand. If either party believes that the case cannot be resolved by motion, such party shall so advise the Court and the opposing party in writing. The Court will take the motions under submission without oral argument, unless the Court otherwise orders. (See document for further details) (vmun)
November 22, 2022 Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (vmun)
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Non-Prisoner Case). (twdb)
November 7, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (et)
November 7, 2022 Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff William Sebron King-Golding. (Kalagian, Marc)
November 7, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff William Sebron King-Golding, (Kalagian, Marc)
November 7, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff William Sebron King-Golding. (Kalagian, Marc)
November 7, 2022 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff William Sebron King-Golding. (Kalagian, Marc)
November 7, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff William Sebron King-Golding. (Attorney Marc V Kalagian added to party William Sebron King-Golding(pty:pla))(Kalagian, Marc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: William Sebron King-Golding v. Kilolo Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Sebron King-Golding
Represented By: Marc V Kalagian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Jennifer Lee Tarn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?