Hector Iraheta v. Nelson Cruz and Associates, LLC
Hector Iraheta |
Nelson Cruz and Associates, LLC |
2:2022cv08123 |
November 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Otis D Wright |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)]; SCHEDULING CONFERENCE [FRCP 26(f)] by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Scheduling Conference set for January 23, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. (lom) |
Filing 12 Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Nelson Cruz and Associates, LLC. (Palecek, Thomas) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Nelson Cruz and Associates, LLC.(Attorney Thomas W Palecek added to party Nelson Cruz and Associates, LLC(pty:dft))(Palecek, Thomas) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hector Iraheta, upon Defendant Nelson Cruz and Associates, LLC served on 11/10/2022, answer due 12/1/2022. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Agruss, Michael) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. ***EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR MSJs*** Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The address is http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nelson Cruz and Associates, LLC. (ghap) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (ghap) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Hector Iraheta. (Agruss, Michael) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Hector Iraheta, identifying none known to Plaintiff. (Agruss, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Hector Iraheta. (Agruss, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34284333 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Hector Iraheta. (Attorney Michael S. Agruss added to party Hector Iraheta(pty:pla))(Agruss, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hector Iraheta v. Nelson Cruz and Associates, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Hector Iraheta | |
Represented By: | Michael S. Agruss |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nelson Cruz and Associates, LLC | |
Represented By: | Thomas W Palecek |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.