Barfresh Food Group, Inc. v. Schreiber Foods, Inc. et al
| Barfresh Food Group, Inc. |
| Schreiber Foods, Inc. and Does 1 through 100 |
| 2:2022cv08222 |
| November 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 CONSENT TO PROCEED before United States Magistrate Judge by all parties pursuant to GO 18-11 is denied by District Judge Percy Anderson. This case shall remain assigned to the District Judge. (rn) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #6 (Attachments: #1 Supplement Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge)(Odegaard, Sarah) |
| Filing 26 OPPOSITION to Motion to Dismiss re: to Dismiss #24 Count 2 of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Barfresh Food Group, Inc.. (Jackson, Larry) |
| Filing 25 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] by Judge Percy Anderson. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE set for February 6, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco) |
| Filing 24 MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Defendant Schreiber Foods, Inc. to Dismiss Count 2 of the Amended Complaint (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Count 2 of the Amended Complaint, #2 Proposed Order)(Odegaard, Sarah) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Schreiber Foods, Inc., identifying Schreiber Foods, Inc.. (Odegaard, Sarah) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Sarah G. Odegaard on behalf of Defendant Schreiber Foods, Inc. (Attorney Sarah G. Odegaard added to party Schreiber Foods, Inc.(pty:dft))(Odegaard, Sarah) |
Filing 21
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court denies Plaintiff's Second Application to File Under Seal Exhibit A to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. (See document for further details).; denying #13 APPLICATION to file document Exhibit A to Amended Complaint under seal. (aco)
|
| Filing 20 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Barfresh Food Group, Inc., re Sealed Declaration in SupportDeclaration #14 , APPLICATION to file document Exhibit A to Amended Complaint under seal #13 served on 12/2/2022. (Jackson, Larry) |
| Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Barfresh Food Group, Inc., upon Defendant Schreiber Foods, Inc. served on 12/2/2022, answer due 12/23/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Jackson, Larry) |
| Filing 18 21 DAY Summons Issued RE: Amended Complaint/Petition #11 as to Defendant Schreiber Foods, Inc. (aco) |
| Filing 17 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #11 filed by Plaintiff Barfresh Food Group, Inc.. (Jackson, Larry) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #15 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write "see attached."Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The case number and/or judge(s)initials are incorrect. Please include the full case number including judge's initials on the request. The correct case number is 2:22-cv-08222-PA-RAOx. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (aco) |
| Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #11 filed by Plaintiff Barfresh Food Group, Inc.. (Jackson, Larry) |
| Filing 14 SEALED DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION to file document Exhibit A to Amended Complaint under seal #13 filed by Plaintiff Barfresh Food Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Document)(Jackson, Larry) |
| Filing 13 APPLICATION to file document Exhibit A to Amended Complaint under seal filed by Plaintiff Barfresh Food Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Redacted Document)(Jackson, Larry) |
|
Filing 12
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. [See Order for details and deadlines.] (es)
|
| Filing 11 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Schreiber Foods, Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Barfresh Food Group, Inc.(Jackson, Larry) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A district court may, and should, grant leave to amend when it appears that subject matter jurisdiction may exist, even though the complaint inadequately alleges jurisdiction. Therefore, the Court grants Plaintiff leave to amend the 1st AC to establish federal subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, if any, is to be filed by November 28, 2022. The failure to file a First Amended Complaint by that date or to adequately allege the Court's subject matter jurisdiction may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. The Court additionally denies Plaintiff's Application to File Document Under Seal (Docket No. 8).; denying #8 APPLICATION to Seal Document. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Barfresh Food Group, Inc., (Jackson, Larry) |
| Filing 8 APPLICATION to file document EXHIBIT A TO THE COMPLAINT under seal filed by Plaintiff Barfresh Food Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration COSTE DECLARATION ISO APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL, #2 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION TO FILE EXHIBIT A TO THE COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL, #3 Unredacted Document UNREDACTED EXHIBIT A OF COMPLAINT PROPOSED TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL, #4 Redacted Document REDACTED EXHIBIT A OF COMPLAINT PROPOSED TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL)(Jackson, Larry) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Riccardo Delle Coste re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff BARFRESH FOOD GROUP, INC.. (Jackson, Larry) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff BARFRESH FOOD GROUP, INC.. (Jackson, Larry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34308572 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff BARFRESH FOOD GROUP, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Larry R Jackson added to party BARFRESH FOOD GROUP, INC.(pty:pla))(Jackson, Larry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
