Crispin Geronimo v. Sugar Foods Corporation et al
Crispin Geronimo |
Sugar Foods Corporation and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
2:2022cv08246 |
November 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Stanley Blumenfeld |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr) |
Filing 12 PRETRIAL AND TRIAL ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr) |
Filing 11 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr: PLEASE READ THIS ORDER (AND ATTACHMENT) CAREFULLY. The complaint was filed on August 26, 2022; the answer was filed on November10, 2022; and the case was removed the next day. The DOE defendants remainingafter February 17, 2023 are dismissed by operation of this Order and withoutfurther notice. The post-settlement status conference is set for 5/19/2023 at 8:30 AM. The pretrial conference is set for 9/8/2023 at 10:00 AM. The jury trial is set for 9/18/2023 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS AND FURTHER DEADLINES. (jgr) |
Filing 10 MINUTES OF Mandatory Scheduling Conference held before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court heard from the parties as to the contents of the joint status report. The Court will issue a separate case management order. Court Reporter: Myra Ponce. (gk) |
Filing 9 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Crispin Geronimo.. (Perez, Carlos) |
Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court sets an in-person Mandatory Scheduling Conference set for hearing on December 16, 2022 at 8:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. The parties shall file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by December 6, 2022. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jgr) |
Filing 7 CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Sugar Foods Corporation. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Crispin Geronimo. Filed in State Court on 8/26/2022 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Sugar Foods Corporation. Filed in State Court on 11/10/2022 Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sugar Foods Corporation, (Kun, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Sugar Foods Corporation. (Kun, Michael) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 22STCV28037 Receipt No: ACACDC-34313599 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Sugar Foods Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: State Court Summons, Complaint, and Related Papers, #2 Exhibit B: Defendant Sugar Foods Corporation's Answer to Plaintiff's Unverified State Court Complaint, #3 Declaration of Sara Ribbler in support of Notice of Removal of Action, #4 Certificate of Service) (Attorney Michael S Kun added to party Sugar Foods Corporation(pty:dft))(Kun, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.