Bon Sung Koo v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. et al
| Bon Sung Koo |
| Delta Air Lines, Inc. and Does 1-10 Inclusive |
| 2:2022cv08294 |
| November 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 1 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Case ordered to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero for Settlement Conference. (lc)
|
|
Filing 16
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (JURY TRIAL) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. This Order is to advise the parties and counsel of the schedule that will govern this case. THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IS VACATED. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/22/2024 01:30 PM ; Jury Trial set for 2/13/2024 09:00 AM ; Motion in Limine set for hearing on 2/5/2024 at 01:30 PM (SEE DOCUMENT FOR ALL SPECIFIED DEADLINES). (lc)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Delta Air Lines, Inc.'s Report #14 , Report #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan. No. 14 appears to be duplicate of no. 13, EXCEPT defendant's attorney "signature" is by a different attorney. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 14 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) filed by Defendant Delta Air Lines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Joint Rule 26(f) Report - EXHIBIT A - Proposed Discovery Timetable)(Irizarry, Dawn) |
| Filing 13 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) filed by Defendant Delta Air Lines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Joint Rule 26(f) Report - EXHIBIT A - Proposed Discovery Timetable)(Irizarry, Dawn) |
| Filing 12 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. This case has been assigned to the calendar of United States District Judge Otis D. Wright II. The responsibility for the progress of litigation in the federal courts falls not only upon the attorneys in the action, but upon the court as well. Scheduling Conference set for 1/9/2023 at 01:30 PM. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. ***EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR MSJs*** Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The address is http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
|
| Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Delta Air Lines, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/14/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Delta Air Lines, Inc., Does 1-10, inclusive.Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Bon Sung Koo. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/7/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bon Sung Koo, upon Defendant Delta Air Lines, Inc. served on 10/12/2022, answer due 11/2/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Koy Saechao/Authorized Agent for Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/17/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Delta Air Lines, Inc., re Declaration #6 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Declaration #5 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 served on November 14, 2022. (Guy, Wanja) |
| Filing 6 DECLARATION of Nadine Alvarez re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Delta Air Lines, Inc.. (Irizarry, Dawn) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION of Dawn M. Irizarry re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Delta Air Lines, Inc.. (Irizarry, Dawn) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Delta Air Lines, Inc., identifying Bon Sung Koo and Delta Air Lines, Inc.. (Irizarry, Dawn) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Delta Air Lines, Inc. identifying (none) as Corporate Parent. (Irizarry, Dawn) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Delta Air Lines, Inc.. (Irizarry, Dawn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 22STCV32991 Receipt No: ACACDC-34318373 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Delta Air Lines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Complaint, #4 Proof of Service, #5 Answer) (Attorney Dawn M Irizarry added to party Delta Air Lines, Inc.(pty:dft))(Irizarry, Dawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
