Shenzhen Naneon Nano Tech Co., Ltd. v. Naneon LLC et al
Plaintiff: SHENZHEN NANEON NANO TECH. CO., LTD. and Shenzhen Naneon Nano Tech Co., Ltd.
Defendant: NANEON LLC, KING TIDE CAPITAL, LLC, SCISSOR BUNNY LLC, SNAPGUARD SOLUTIONS INC., NANOFLOWX, INC., RICK FUNG, evan ROTHSTEIN and yu ting huang
Case Number: 2:2022cv08328
Filed: November 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Pedro V Castillo
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2022 Filing 26 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Snapguard Solutions Inc. (gk)
November 17, 2022 Filing 25 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Scissor Bunny LLC. (gk)
November 17, 2022 Filing 24 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Evan Rothstein. (gk)
November 17, 2022 Filing 23 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant NanoFlowX, Inc. (gk)
November 17, 2022 Filing 22 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant King Tide Capital, LLC. (gk)
November 17, 2022 Filing 21 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Yu Ting Huang. (gk)
November 17, 2022 Filing 20 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Rick Fung. (gk)
November 17, 2022 Filing 19 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Naneon LLC. (gk)
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (hc)
November 15, 2022 Filing 17 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by Plaintiff Shenzhen Naneon Nano Tech Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Proposed Summons to Fung, #2 Supplement Proposed Summons to Huang, #3 Supplement Proposed Summons to King Tide Capital, #4 Supplement Proposed Summons to NanoflowX, #5 Supplement Proposed Summons to Rothstein, #6 Supplement Proposed Summons to Scissor Bunny, #7 Supplement Proposed Summons to Snapguard)(Deng, Yifei)
November 15, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #14 , Summons Request #13 , Summons Request #12 , Summons Request #11 , Summons Request #8 , Summons Request #7 , Summons Request #10 , Summons Request #9 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (sh)
November 15, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Attachment(s): No. 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 2. The document(s) should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (sh)
November 15, 2022 Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by Plaintiff Shenzhen Naneon Nano Tech Co., Ltd.. (Deng, Yifei)
November 15, 2022 Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by Plaintiff Shenzhen Naneon Nano Tech Co., Ltd.. (Deng, Yifei)
November 15, 2022 Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by Plaintiff Shenzhen Naneon Nano Tech Co., Ltd.. (Deng, Yifei)
November 15, 2022 Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by Plaintiff Shenzhen Naneon Nano Tech Co., Ltd.. (Deng, Yifei)
November 15, 2022 Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by Plaintiff Shenzhen Naneon Nano Tech Co., Ltd.. (Deng, Yifei)
November 15, 2022 Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by Plaintiff Shenzhen Naneon Nano Tech Co., Ltd.. (Deng, Yifei)
November 15, 2022 Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by Plaintiff Shenzhen Naneon Nano Tech Co., Ltd.. (Deng, Yifei)
November 15, 2022 Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by Plaintiff Shenzhen Naneon Nano Tech Co., Ltd.. (Deng, Yifei)
November 15, 2022 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
November 15, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
November 15, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (sh)
November 15, 2022 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Shenzhen Naneon Nano Tech Co., Ltd. (Deng, Yifei)
November 14, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (402 paid on 11/14/2022, receipt number 34322760), filed by Plaintiff SHENZHEN NANEON NANO TECH. CO., LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Deng, Yifei)
November 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34322760 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff SHENZHEN NANEON NANO TECH. CO., LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3) (Attorney Yifei Deng added to party SHENZHEN NANEON NANO TECH. CO., LTD.(pty:pla))(Deng, Yifei)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shenzhen Naneon Nano Tech Co., Ltd. v. Naneon LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHENZHEN NANEON NANO TECH. CO., LTD.
Represented By: Yifei Deng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shenzhen Naneon Nano Tech Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Yifei Deng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NANEON LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KING TIDE CAPITAL, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SCISSOR BUNNY LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SNAPGUARD SOLUTIONS INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NANOFLOWX, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICK FUNG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: evan ROTHSTEIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: yu ting huang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?