Brandon Viado v. Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Plaintiff: Brandon Viado
Defendant: Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Case Number: 2:2022cv08335
Filed: November 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Referring Judge: John F Walter
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2023 Filing 13 Text Entry Order STRIKING Docket No. #11 for the reasons stated in the Clerk's Notice #12 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
December 9, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: REQUEST #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed document was not submitted or was not submitted as a separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv)
December 6, 2022 Filing 11 REQUEST filed by Plaintiff Brandon Viado. (iv)
November 21, 2022 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Harbor-UCLA Medical Center. (et)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #3 by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: The Request is GRANTED. (rolm)
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv)
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
November 15, 2022 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
November 15, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
November 15, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car)
November 15, 2022 Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT , #1 filed by Plaintiff Brandon Viado (car) Modified on 11/15/2022 (car).
November 14, 2022 Filing 3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS filed by Plaintiff Brandon Viado. (car)
November 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Harbor-UCLA Medical Center. Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Brandon Viado. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brandon Viado v. Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandon Viado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?