Janus Et Cie v. Janice Feldman
Plaintiff: JANUS ET CIE
Defendant: JANICE FELDMAN and Janice Feld
Case Number: 2:2022cv08352
Filed: November 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2023 Filing 23 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Janus Et Cie (Trowbridge, Daniel)
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Percy Anderson. REQUEST of Attorney Jonathan D. Daugherty to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Janus Et Cie, designating Fred M. Blum as local counsel.; granting #21 Non-Resident Attorney Jonathan D. Daugherty. (aco)
November 30, 2022 Filing 21 First REQUEST of Non-Resident Attorney Jonathan D. Dougherty to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Janus Et Cie (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34401397) filed by plaintiff Janus Et Cie. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order) (Habib, Farheena)
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Percy Anderson. APPLICATION of Attorney Ivan O. Klineto Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Janus Et Cie, designating Fred M. Blum as local counsel.; granting #15 Non-Resident Attorney Ivan O. Kline. (aco)
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE #14 by Judge Percy Anderson. APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Janus Et Cie, designating Fred M Blum as local counsel. granting #14 Non-Resident Attorney Stuart I Friedman (rolm)
November 23, 2022 Filing 18 NOTICE OF LODGING filed of Proposed Order granting Pro Hac Vice re First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Stuart I. Friedman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Janus Et Cie (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34367298) #14 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice of Lodging - Friedman)(Habib, Farheena)
November 23, 2022 Filing 17 NOTICE OF LODGING filed of Proposed Order Granting Pro Hac Vice re First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Ivan O. Kline to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Janus Et Cie (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34367735) #15 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice of Lodging - Kline)(Habib, Farheena)
November 22, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Ivan O. Kline to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Janus Et Cie (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34367735) #15 , First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Stuart I. Friedman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Janus Et Cie (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34367298) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(b) Proposed order not attached. (sbou)
November 22, 2022 Filing 15 First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Ivan O. Kline to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Janus Et Cie (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34367735) filed by plaintiff Janus Et Cie. (Habib, Farheena)
November 22, 2022 Filing 14 First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Stuart I. Friedman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Janus Et Cie (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34367298) filed by plaintiff Janus Et Cie. (Habib, Farheena)
November 21, 2022 Filing 13 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Janus Et Cie. (Habib, Farheena)
November 21, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Janus Et Cie, identifying Haworth, Inc.. (Attorney Farheena Habib added to party Janus Et Cie(pty:pla))(Habib, Farheena)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. Pursuant to the Notice of Deficiencies #5 , Plaintiff is to file and enter the Civil Cover Sheet and Notice of Interested Parties separately under their correct events no later than November 23, 2022. The failure to file the Civil Cover Sheet and Notice of Interested Parties by November 23, 2022 will result in the dismissal of the complaint without prejudice without further warning. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pk) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. [See Order for details and deadlines.] (es)
November 17, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jonathan D. Daugherty. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil)
November 17, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Ivan O. Kline. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil)
November 17, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Stuart I. Friedman. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil)
November 17, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet and Notice of Interested Parties/Corporate Disclosure Statement were incorrectly filed as attachments. Please utilize CM/ECF resources such as the search tool to locate the appropriate events for filing. No further action is required unless directed by the Court. (jtil)
November 17, 2022 Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
November 17, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
November 17, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (jtil)
November 15, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34331123 - Fee: $402, filed by PLAINTIFF JANUS ET CIE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement) (Attorney Farheena Habib added to party JANUS ET CIE(pty:pla))(Habib, Farheena)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Janus Et Cie v. Janice Feldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JANUS ET CIE
Represented By: Farheena Habib
Represented By: Fred M Blum
Represented By: Ivan O. Kline
Represented By: Jennifer L Lallite
Represented By: Jesper I Rasmussen
Represented By: Jonathan D. Daugherty
Represented By: Stuart I Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JANICE FELDMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Janice Feld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?