Sandra Waswick v. Torrid Holdings, Inc. et al
| Sandra Waswick |
| Torrid Holdings, Inc., Elizabeth Munoz, George Wehlitz, Stefan L. Kaluzny, Dary Kopelioff, Lisa Harper, Theo Killion, Morgan Stanley and Co. LLC, BofA Securities, Inc., Goldman Sachs and Co. LLC, Jefferies LLC, Robert W. Baird and Co. Incorporated, Cowen and Company, LLC, William Blair and Company, L.L.C., Telsey Advisory Group LLC, Sycamore Partners Management, L.P., Sycamore Partners Torrid, L.L.C., Sycamore Partners, L.P., Sycamore Partners Associates-C, L.P., Sycamore Partners Associates, L.P., Sycamore Partners Associates Investments, L.P., Sycamore Partners Co-Invest, L.L.C. and Sycamore Partners Associates Co-Invest, L.P. |
| 2:2022cv08375 |
| November 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Alka Sagar |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants BofA Securities, Inc., Cowen and Company, LLC, Goldman Sachs and Co. LLC, Lisa Harper, Jefferies LLC, Stefan L. Kaluzny, Theo Killion, Dary Kopelioff, Morgan Stanley and Co. LLC, Elizabeth Munoz, Robert W. Baird and Co. Incorporated, Sycamore Partners Associates Co-Invest, L.P., Sycamore Partners Associates Investments, L.P., Sycamore Partners Associates, L.P., Sycamore Partners Associates-C, L.P., Sycamore Partners Co-Invest, L.L.C., Sycamore Partners Management, L.P., Sycamore Partners Torrid, L.L.C., Sycamore Partners, L.P., Telsey Advisory Group LLC, Torrid Holdings, Inc., George Wehlitz, William Blair and Company, L.L.C. (aco) |
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. [See Order for details and deadlines.] (es)
|
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #8 filed by Plaintiff Sandra Waswick. (Middleton, Brett) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Sandra Waswick, (Middleton, Brett) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Sandra Waswick. (Middleton, Brett) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Sandra Waswick. (Middleton, Brett) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34336116 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Sandra Waswick. (Attorney Brett M Middleton added to party Sandra Waswick(pty:pla))(Middleton, Brett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
