Xuan Diep et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of America et al
| Xuan Diep, Phong Cao Diep Diep and Phuong Thi Doan |
| Safeco Insurance Company of America and Does 1 to 50, Inclusive |
| 2:2022cv08425 |
| November 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of America, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 11/18/2022. (Russum, Blake) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of America, (Russum, Blake) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of America. (Russum, Blake) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22STCV33386 with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 11/18/2022, receipt number ACACDC-34346437), filed by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1, #2 Exhibit A-2, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Declaration) (Attorney Blake Justin Russum added to party Safeco Insurance Company of America(pty:dft))(Russum, Blake) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
