Rodolfo Gutierrez v. International Paper Company et al
| Rodolfo Gutierrez |
| International Paper Company, Sylvamo North America, LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv08460 |
| November 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| John F Walter |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant International Paper Company (Olsen, Aaron) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant International Paper Company, identifying Plaintiff, Rodolfo Gutierrez; Crosner Legal, PC, Counsel for Plaintiff; Defendant, International Paper Company; and Defendant, Sylvamo North America, LLC. (Olsen, Aaron) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant International Paper Company. (Olsen, Aaron) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22STCV33066 Receipt No: ACACDC-34351960 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant International Paper Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Christopher Champine in Support of Defendant's Notice of Removal, #2 Declaration of Cissy Braslow in Support of Defendant's Notice of Removal) (Attorney Aaron F Olsen added to party International Paper Company(pty:dft))(Olsen, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
