Jessie Cantu v. Hallmark Cards, Inc. et al
| Jesse Cantu |
| Hallmark Cards, Inc. and Does 1 through 25, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv08473 |
| November 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Hallmark Cards, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Jesse Cantu. (Ferrell, Scott) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jesse Cantu, (Ferrell, Scott) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jesse Cantu. (Ferrell, Scott) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34353862 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Jesse Cantu. (Attorney Scott J Ferrell added to party Jesse Cantu(pty:pla))(Ferrell, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
