Joseph Ruigomez et al v. The Dinardo Law Firm, P.C. et al
| Joseph Ruigomez, Kathleen Ruigomez and Jamie Ruigomez |
| The Dinardo Law Firm, P.C., Joseph Dinardo and Does 1-20 |
| 2:2022cv08513 |
| November 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R Wilner |
| George H Wu |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 REPLY in support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #14 filed by Defendants Joseph Dinardo, The Dinardo Law Firm, P.C.. (Scherer, Richard) |
Filing 19
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge George H. Wu. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report (Docket No. #18 ) and finds it can set the schedule in this matter without hearing further statements from the parties. As per C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15, the January 12, 2023 scheduling conference date is taken off calendar. The present lawsuit is a Song-Beverly/"lemon law" action. The Court sets the following dates: 1. The parties are free to amend pleadings under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 up to January 30, 2023. 2. A post-mediation status conference is set for July 27, 2023 at 8:30 a.m., with mediation to be completed by July 24. 3. All regular discovery will be completed by July 14, 2023. 4. All expert discovery will be completed by August 18, 2023. 5. The last day for the Court to hear any motions (other than motions in limine which will be heard at the pre-trial conference) is September 14, 2023. 6. The pre-trial conference will be held on October 12, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. 7. Court trial will begin on October 24, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. See minute order for details. (lom)
|
| Filing 18 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 to 6 days, filed by Plaintiffs Jamie Ruigomez, Joseph Ruigomez, Kathleen Ruigomez.. (Forsley, Alan) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER ON STIPULATION #16 CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. It is hereby ordered as follows: 1. The hearing on Defendants Motion to Dismiss shall be continued to January 26, 2023 at 8:30 a.m., which shall also extend the date by which Defendants shall file a reply brief to January 12, 2023. 2. The parties shall file a Joint 26(f) Report on or before January 9, 2023. 3. The Scheduling Conference shall be continued to January 12, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. (aco)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION to Continue Hearing on Motion to Dismiss and Deadline to file Rule 26(f) from January 12, 2023 and December 29, 2022, respectively to January 26, 2023 and January 12, 2023, respectively Re: Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only, #10 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #14 filed by Defendants Joseph Dinardo, The Dinardo Law Firm, P.C.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Scherer, Richard) |
| Filing 15 Opposition Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Declaration of Alan W. Forsley re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #14 filed by Plaintiffs Jamie Ruigomez, Joseph Ruigomez, Kathleen Ruigomez. (Forsley, Alan) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants Joseph Dinardo, The Dinardo Law Firm, P.C.. Motion set for hearing on 1/12/2023 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (Scherer, Richard) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE filed by Defendants Joseph Dinardo, The Dinardo Law Firm, P.C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Scherer, Richard) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H. Wu. APPLICATION of Attorney Richard M. Scherer, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Joseph Dinardo, The Dinardo Law Firm, P.C., designating Jeff W. Poole as local counsel.; granting #11 Non-Resident Attorney Richard M. Scherer, Jr. (aco)
|
| Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Richard M. Scherer, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Joseph Dinardo, The Dinardo Law Firm, P.C. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34433548) filed by Defendants Joseph Dinardo, The Dinardo Law Firm, P.C.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Poole, Jeff) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu.The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for January 5, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel are reminded of their obligations to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan, and report to the Court, as required by F.R.C.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Trial counsel are ordered to be present. A Joint 26(f) Report shall be filed with the Court no later than December 29, 2022. See Local Rule 26-1. (aco)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Dinardo Law Firm, P.C. answer now due 12/12/2022; Joseph Dinardo answer now due 12/12/2022, filed by Defendant The Dinardo Law Firm, P.C.; Joseph Dinardo.(Poole, Jeff) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Joseph Dinardo, The Dinardo Law Firm, P.C., (Poole, Jeff) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Joseph Dinardo, Does 1-20, inclusive, The Dinardo Law Firm, P.C., filed by plaintiffs Joseph Ruigomez, Jamie Ruigomez, Kathleen Ruigomez. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/30/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants JOSEPH DINARDO, THE DINARDO LAW FIRM, P.C.. (Poole, Jeff) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 22STCV32203 Receipt No: ACACDC-34359040 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants THE DINARDO LAW FIRM, P.C., JOSEPH DINARDO. (Attorney Jeff W. Poole added to party JOSEPH DINARDO(pty:dft), Attorney Jeff W. Poole added to party THE DINARDO LAW FIRM, P.C.(pty:dft))(Poole, Jeff) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
