Rickey L. Alford v. State Bar Committee et al
| Rickey L. Alford and Morris Day |
| State Bar Committee, State Bar of California, Leah T. Wilson, James Gongora, Andre Birotte, Jr and Alka Sagar |
| 2:2022cv08542 |
| November 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #2 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Request is DENIED. This case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (iv)
|
| Filing 3 Text Only Entry: This case has been assigned to United States District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The case number on all documents filed with the Court should read 2:22-cv-08542-FMO. Please refer to the assigned judge's Procedures and Schedules, available on the Court's website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov/judges-requirements, for additional information. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (car) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Rickey L. Alford. (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Rickey L. Alford. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
