Roozbeh Tat v. State of California et al
| Roozbeh Tat |
| State of California, City of Los Angeles, Department of Mental Health, Public Gaurdian, Does 1-50, official capacity, United States Military, Los Angeles Police Department LAPD and Central Intelligence Agency CIA |
| 2:2022cv08570 |
| November 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #9 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: On the question of indigency, the Court finds that the party who filed the Request: is not able to pay the filing fees. The Request is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT SEE ATTACHMENT : The Court grants the request to proceed in forma pauperis notwithstanding a significant number of fanciful allegations presented in the First Amended Complaint. Nothing in this Order precludes the Magistrate Judge from screening the pleading pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). (lc)
|
| Filing 11 C.C.P SECTION 664.6 STIPULATION AND ORDER filed by Plaintiff Roozbeh Tat.(es) |
| Filing 10 LETTER from Plaintiff Roozbeh Tat. (et) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Roozbeh Tat. (et) |
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Los Angeles, Department of Mental Health, Public Gaurdian, State of California, United States Military, United States Military, Los Angeles Police Department LAPD, Central Intelligence Agency CIA, Does amending Complaint - (Referred) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Roozbeh Tat(et) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #6 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: On the question of indigency, the Court finds that the party who filed the Request: has not submitted enough information for the Court to tell if the filer is able to pay the filing fees. This is what is missing: Plaintiff's second request, like the first one, is unsigned in violation of Local Rules 5-4.3.4 and 11-1. Because Plaintiff is not a registered CM/ECF filer, documents he files must feature his hand-signed signature. The filing may be stricken under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a). Ruling on the Request is POSTPONED for 30 days so that the filer may provide additional information. Within 30 days Plaintiff must file a signed complaint and request to proceed in forma pauperis. Else, the unsigned complaint and request will be stricken, and this case will be dismissed without prejudice. Fed. Rs. Civ. P. 11(a), 41(b).. (lc) Modified on 12/12/2022 (lc).
|
| Filing 6 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Roozbeh Tat. (es) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #2 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The Court has reviewed the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (the "Request") and the documents submitted with it. On the question of indigency, the Court finds that the party who filed the Request: has not submitted enough information for the Court to tell if the filer is able to pay the filing fees. This is what is missing: The request is unsigned in violation of Local Rules 5-4.3.4 and 11- 1. The filing may be stricken under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 (a). The request also does not provide answers to questions about Plaintiffs past or present employment income. The Court lacks sufficient information to determine whether Plaintiff is indigent. Plaintiff may cure these errors by filing a complete, signed Form CV-60. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Ruling on the Request is POSTPONED for 30 days so that the filer may provide additional information. See order for details. (lom)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (lh) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Roozbeh Tat. (lh) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Plaintiff Roozbeh Tat. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants City of Los Angeles, Department of Mental Health, Does, Public Gaurdian, State of California Case assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick.(Filing fee$402), filed by Plaintiff Roozbeh Tat. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Request) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
