David Van Gilder v. Kilolo Kijakazi
| David Van Gilder |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 2:2022cv08612 |
| November 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Sheri Pym |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Michael K Marriott added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Marriott, Michael)
|
|
Filing 9
DECLARATION OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff David Van Gilder, re Order #8 served on 1/4/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Proof)(Drake, Erika)
|
|
Filing 8
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS.) (es)
|
|
Filing 7
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff David Van Gilder, upon Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi served on 12/30/2022, answer due 2/28/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by unspecified means. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by unspecified means. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Proof)(Drake, Erika)
|
|
Filing 6
60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 4
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff David Van Gilder. (Drake, Erika)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff David Van Gilder, (Drake, Erika)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff David Van Gilder. (Drake, Erika)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-34378447 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff David Van Gilder. (Attorney Erika Drake added to party David Van Gilder(pty:pla))(Drake, Erika)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: David Van Gilder v. Kilolo Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Van Gilder | |
| Represented By: | Erika Drake |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Michael K Marriott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
