Hao Zheng v. USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office
| Hao Zheng |
| USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office |
| 2:2022cv08620 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY THE CASE PENDING ADJUDICATION OF APPLICATION #9 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. See order for specifics. (lom)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Adjudication of Application filed by Defendant USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Jasmin Yang added to party USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office(pty:dft))(Yang, Jasmin) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (lh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (lh) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Hao Zheng. (Chen, Michael) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Hao Zheng, identifying None. (Chen, Michael) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Hao Zheng. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement)(Chen, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34379521 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Hao Zheng. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Michael Chen added to party Hao Zheng(pty:pla))(Chen, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hao Zheng v. USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hao Zheng | |
| Represented By: | Michael Chen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office | |
| Represented By: | Jasmin Yang |
| Represented By: | OIL-DCS Trial Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
