Jose Javier Arana v. Tesla Motors, Inc. et al
| Jose Javier Arana |
| Tesla Motors, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, Inclusive |
| 2:2022cv08664 |
| November 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 REPLY Reply in Support of a Motion NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #13 filed by Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc.. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 21 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #13 filed by Plaintiff Jose Javier Arana. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Cooper, David) |
| Filing 20 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #13 filed by Plaintiff Jose Javier Arana. (Cooper, David) |
Filing 19
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE OPPOSITION #18 by Judge R. Gary Klausner The Court having considered Plaintiff JOSE JAVIER ARANA's unopposed ex parte request for leave to file late opposition to defendant Tesla Motors, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss per FRCP 12(b)(6), and good cause found, the ex parte request is GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to file his Opposition with 24-hours of this Order. (jp)
|
| Filing 18 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to file Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by plaintiff Jose Javier Arana. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Counsel, #2 Exhibit A--stipulation of opposing counsel, #3 Exhibit B--proposed Opposition to be filed, #4 Proposed Order granting leave to file Opposition) (Cooper, David) |
| Filing 17 Notice Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc.. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #13 by Judge R. Gary Klausner. A notice of interested parties shall be filed no later than 5 days from entry of this Order. (jre) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No notice of interested parties. (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/6/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 2/13/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 1/30/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Sasha Bassi In Support of Defendant Tesla, Inc's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint) (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #11 by Judge R. Gary Klausner that Defendant Tesla, Inc.'s deadline tofile a response to Plaintiffs Complaint is hereby extended to 12/28/2022. (jp)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response filed by Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Sasha Bassi In Support of Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint, #2 Proposed Order Order on Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint)(Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party Tesla Motors, Inc.(pty:dft))(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jose Javier Arana, upon Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc. served on 11/30/2022, answer due 12/21/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation % Daisy Montenegro - Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Mobasseri, Robert) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc.. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (sh) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Robert B Mobasseri counsel for Plaintiff Jose Javier Arana. Adding David Alan Cooper as counsel of record for JOSE JAVIER ARANA for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiff JOSE JAVIER ARANA. (Mobasseri, Robert) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jose Javier Arana, (Mobasseri, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jose Javier Arana. (Mobasseri, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34392313 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Jose Javier Arana. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Robert B Mobasseri added to party Jose Javier Arana(pty:pla))(Mobasseri, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
