East Coast Foods, Inc. v. Bradley D. Sharp et al
| East Coast Foods, Inc. |
| Bradley D. Sharp |
| 2:2022cv08710 |
| November 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff East Coast Foods, Inc.. Dismissal is without prejudice. (De La Paz, Carlos) |
Filing 10
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (OSC) RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/23/2023. [See document for further details.] (es)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Bradley D. Sharp. (vmun) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by plaintiff East Coast Foods, Inc.. (De La Paz, Carlos) |
|
Filing 7
INITIAL ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (See document for details) (vmun)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: The date and signature line must be left blank. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by Plaintiff East Coast Foods, Inc.. (De La Paz, Carlos) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff East Coast Foods, Inc., identifying East Coast Foods, Inc., wholly owned by Herbert Hudson, Bradley D. Sharp Development Specialists, Inc.. (De La Paz, Carlos) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff East Coast Foods, Inc.. (De La Paz, Carlos) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34402633 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff East Coast Foods, Inc.. (Attorney Carlos Alberto De La Paz added to party East Coast Foods, Inc.(pty:pla))(De La Paz, Carlos) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: East Coast Foods, Inc. v. Bradley D. Sharp et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: East Coast Foods, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Carlos Alberto De La Paz |
| Represented By: | Glen Henry Mertens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bradley D. Sharp | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
